this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
722 points (99.0% liked)

World News

39380 readers
2772 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

France’s Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor, its most powerful at 1,600 MW, was connected to the grid on December 21 after 17 years of construction plagued by delays and budget overruns.

The European Pressurized Reactor (EPR), designed to boost nuclear energy post-Chernobyl, is 12 years behind schedule and cost €13.2 billion, quadruple initial estimates.

President Macron hailed the launch as a key step for low-carbon energy and energy security.

Nuclear power, which supplies 60% of France’s electricity, is central to Macron’s plan for a “nuclear renaissance.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah or put another way: All that nuclear waste we occasionally talk about burying under a mountain has something like more than 90% of its energy left.

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

No.

They speak about it in the article I linked (in French unfortunately). The waste that we talk about burying is what's left AFTER extracting all the components that could be reused.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have always wondered how it's stored... always imagined like 55 Gal drums in some Simpsonsesque way, but that doesn't really make sense... but maybe it does?

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Like that but way bigger. The fuel is still in solid form and stored in giant heavy dry casks that essentially armor that fuel from the outside world.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Also encased in glass, and both the cask and the glass can stop the radiations on their own iirc.