this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
722 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

60112 readers
2058 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 160 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Somebody better nullify that jury.

[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It only takes of working man to get on it to make it flop

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

And here's your 12 jury members.......

Oh, it's Mark Cuban, Mark Zuckerburg, Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Rupert Murdoch,

.........I could keep this joke going if I used google, but is it sad that I could name 6 people by memory just by using the parameters "Rich asshole who would have no empathy for the general public, and would absolutely convict"?

[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

it would have to be 12 CEOs but they deff aint got to be proper owner oligarch... just scrape some middling f500 roaster with some "nonames"

but yes valid point... but defense can generally strike some of these.

this guy going to need proper counsel, I am assuming fun raising won't be an issue. he deserves the best.

coupled with proper PR campaign on socials since TV will try to destroy him.

this jury must not convict because the glove don't fit hehe

[–] Norin@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Plenty of lawyers, at least some of them talented, will offer to defend him for free.

It could make their career.

[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 2 weeks ago

defense of this scale will require several million dollars, nobody will do that for free.

also, defending this guy will make you enemy of the owner class. top talent will opt out.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I could name 6 people by memory just by using the parameters "Rich asshole who would have no empathy for the general pub

You should find more about gates than the name

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_%26_Melinda_Gates_Foundation

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I am not going to watch 70 minutes movie, but according to brief skimming through the discussion it's about business practice of the Microsoft from times of windows 3.11

I am talking about his today's undeniable philantropic work and the fact is he is really far from the rest of the people on your list.

People are allowed to evolve and if every billionaire in the world would evolve I'm the same direction he did, world would be better place.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

It's a podcast and you can listen while doing other things. 70 minutes isn't very long.

You can deny his recent philanthropic work because his libertarian mentality corrupts it. He helped fund covid 19 vaccine research, but also demanded that the patents not be released, so profit could be made. This is in direct contrast to the lead scientist of the poli vaccine opening it up for anyone to make, comparing the ownership of a vaccine to trying to own sunlight.

While there's evidence that Gates did not participate in Epstein's parties, he did know about and choose to stay silent.

Gates is a full blown elite larping as a humanitarian when the role of his foundation should be occupied by a tax funded gov org.

[–] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm fairly certain they'll just find a new jury

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 11 points 2 weeks ago

we gonna keep trying until we win...

tbh that is the ruling class MO tho

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I mean… it does seem pretty fair? If the jury is hung it’s up to the state to retry. If the jury comes back not guilty then that’s the end of it.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Fortunately in criminal trials if the Jury can return a not guilty verdict, that's game over for the states case. Double jeopardy they can't retry.

Now if one guy on the Jury opposes a guilty verdict, and no verdict is reached, then the state can retry.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

They could also go after him with Thompson's family in civil suit to destroy him financially, which it turns out is not double jeopardy