this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
549 points (92.6% liked)

Technology

60166 readers
3080 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
549
Typing monkey would be unable to produce 'Hamlet' within the lifetime of the universe, study finds (phys.org)
submitted 2 months ago by VantaBrandon@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
196 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The question that everyone has been dying to know has been answered. Finally! What will scientists study next?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

the paper used the entire population (200 thousand) and would take some 10 ^ 10 ^ 7 heat deaths of the universe

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 42 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It could happen the very first time a monkey sat down at a typewriter. It's just very unlikely.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago (5 children)

from the wiki article
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem

If there were as many monkeys as there are atoms in the observable universe typing extremely fast for trillions of times the life of the universe, the probability of the monkeys replicating even a single page of Shakespeare is unfathomably small.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

... the probability of the monkeys replicating even a single page of Shakespeare is unfathomably small.

But not zero.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Basically nothing is ever truly zero

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Someone wiser than me already said that it already has happened: 1 ape did, in fact, write the complete works of Shakespeare.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

ape != monkey

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

apes ⊂ monkeys, actually.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

monkey c monkey do

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Apes are monkeys though, just like we're apes and birds are dinosaurs

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

We are apes and birds are dinosaurs, but monkeys and apes are distinct categories under primates so no, apes are not monkeys.

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough. I wouldn’t want to insult the Librarian.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The probability of lots of things is zero. The probability of a monkey typing a Chinese character on an English keyboard is zero.

Similar idea: there are an infinite amount of numbers between zero and one, but none of those numbers is two.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I am.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Hello "Zero"!

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

Weird how neither of those numbers are infinities. Almost like the numbers used are unfathomably small in comparison.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

So you’re telling me… there’s a chance!

Sorry, I’m sort of lampooning comments like the one above and below you where people just can’t resist focusing on the possibility, no matter how ridiculously remote it seems. For myself, there’s a point of “functionally zero odds” that I’m willing to accept and move on with my life.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago

so you're saying there's a chance...

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

So you're saying there's a chance.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

ok so the monkeys need to type faster

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

Let's put them in open spaces in offices and micro-mananage then, that'll work.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Irrelevant. The heat death of the universe is a constraint unrelated to the premise of the original problem.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I don't think it's a constraint, it's more like a measuring stick to try to show how ridiculously long that time is

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

It's really not that long, if we can't get monkeys to write Shakespeare.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We could breed monkeys to much higher populations.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If we're considering even chimps "monkeys", there's already eight billion of them, I think that's enough.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

enough to cut a few zeros of a number with 10 million of them