this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
88 points (97.8% liked)

World News

39034 readers
2799 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ravhall@discuss.online -1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I don’t recall hearing anything recently about a push to manufacture inside the states. Just a lot of pushing to places like India.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Have you not kept up with the microchip fab they've been moving to Arizona? It was a whole big thing.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What else besides microchips?

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I like how you're making light of microchips so small only a handful of plants in the world can make them but yeah no big deal. But also lots of renewable energy plants, and companies, those are very ubiquitous.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 0 points 1 month ago

I’m saying that “made in USA” is not a label I see very often. And each one of those American owned companies should make an effort to put that label on their products.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

There's a little bit here and there. There were some federal laws to incentivize microchip manufacturing in the U.S., but it's not really an overall thing.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There has always been a push to manufacture in the states. The first buy American law dates back to 1933 (or at least the first I found with a quick search - feel free to correct me if you know more). George Washington wore a suit from New England at his inauguration to encourage American manufacturing. Things have been moving elsewhere for a long time, but there is still a push to build in the US, and new manufacturing in the Us is created all the time.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

The series of free trade agreements the US negotiated with everyone they could would say otherwise.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Created as fast as it’s lost?

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Created faster than lost overall. There is more total manufactured in the US than at anytime in history. However population is up even more than production and jobs in factories are down by an order of magnitude (because of automation) and so it seems like we are producing less.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you're producing less per capita, and consuming more per capita, you're producing less overall for the purposes of the discussion around relative pain of cutting off Chinese imports.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That sounds like a "how to lie" with statistic fact. You can use per capita or total production numbers to make different arguments.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, it's focusing the conversation.

We're talking about the relative pain of cutting off Chinese imports or getting into a trade war with them. In that context, the fact that we import far more from them then we produce domestically compared with decades ago means that it will be more painful to do so now than it would have been decades ago.

The reality is that while there is a tiny 'buy American' push from some people, the vast majority of the American economy and regulations are setup to allow private capital to trade freely abroad and import at will. And it was done intentionally so that rich people could benefit from cheap overseas labour, furthering wealth inequality when middle class factory workers lost their jobs to increase corporate profits with cheaper overseas factories.