this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
87 points (97.8% liked)

World News

38640 readers
1760 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ravhall@discuss.online 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Created as fast as it’s lost?

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Created faster than lost overall. There is more total manufactured in the US than at anytime in history. However population is up even more than production and jobs in factories are down by an order of magnitude (because of automation) and so it seems like we are producing less.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If you're producing less per capita, and consuming more per capita, you're producing less overall for the purposes of the discussion around relative pain of cutting off Chinese imports.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That sounds like a "how to lie" with statistic fact. You can use per capita or total production numbers to make different arguments.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

No, it's focusing the conversation.

We're talking about the relative pain of cutting off Chinese imports or getting into a trade war with them. In that context, the fact that we import far more from them then we produce domestically compared with decades ago means that it will be more painful to do so now than it would have been decades ago.

The reality is that while there is a tiny 'buy American' push from some people, the vast majority of the American economy and regulations are setup to allow private capital to trade freely abroad and import at will. And it was done intentionally so that rich people could benefit from cheap overseas labour, furthering wealth inequality when middle class factory workers lost their jobs to increase corporate profits with cheaper overseas factories.