this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
317 points (97.0% liked)

World News

38634 readers
3496 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Having damning material to blackmail a President would be a problem, even if the material comes from activity prior to time as a President. We do not want that.

The only problem with the damning material prior or not, is that it happened in the first place.

If a future president has something so damning they could use it for blackmail, we should all know and be thankful it was bought to public light.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Setting aside the general problems with being able to split the interests of a leader away from that of the country he leads, blackmail doesn't entail simply releasing information, but rather agreeing to refrain from doing so in exchange for some action that would not otherwise have been taken. Say a President agrees to do something against the interests of the public in exchange for the non-disclosure of information.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 4 days ago

More reason to push to disclose as much information as possible, not give state protection to hide it.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

Yes, this is a small part of why so-called "representative" democracy is a joke. It depends entirely on people who are completely controllable.