this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
69 points (88.8% liked)

Steam

10184 readers
3 users here now

Steam is a video game digital distribution service by Valve.

Steam News | Steam Beta Client news

Useful tools:
SteamDB
SteamCharts
Issue tracker for Linux version of Steam

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/21789832

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kaijobu@discuss.tchncs.de 50 points 2 months ago (4 children)

They forced unusual guidelines in the second half to influencers and streamers who have received a key from them.

https://videogames.si.com/news/black-myth-wukong-streamers-feminist-propaganda

Very interesting do's and dont's.

[–] ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world 41 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Are those themes actually present in game, or is this another "please don't hurt our feelings" from China?

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

ok, umm... so, i'm a little confused. since none of the verboten themes are actually present in the game, why is the game launch being DDoSed? i'm guessing that online backlash to the restrictions has been... typical, but if the restrictions don't really connect to any actual game content, what gives?

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The restrictions are on people who are playing the game(and showing it off prior to release).

The restrictions are showing that the company selling the game is kinda shitty.

We cannot say for certain but it’s possible that someone(s) in the first group, the customers, is trying to disrupt the sales for a game from a shitty company.

The people who care about and released the restrictions and the people who would be affected by the attack are the same people. The attack isn’t about in-game themes because if it was they simply wouldn’t launch the game.

[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The devs may not be shitty, they just have to protect themselves from their government.

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

To add some context to the other replies you’ve gotten, the restrictions were on streamers and reviewers who would be playing the game, not sure if it was an agreement for prerelease access or not though.

I also don’t know if the DDoS was related, but I think the issue was a Chinese developer trying to force non-Chinese streamers to avoid talking about topics embarrassing to or prohibited by the Chinese government.

The restrictions might not connect to any actual game content, but by even bringing it up the developers created the connection.

What gives is right, but for the developers. They managed to Streisand effect their shit, but over something that didn’t even exist in the game in the first place.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

aha, ok, thanks for the cliff's notes version ;)

[–] Kaijobu@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago

I don't know if this has anything to do with the ddos. It's just the controversy I came across before the release. It might be connected, but it also might not.

[–] nichtburningturtle@feddit.org 5 points 2 months ago

This is weird.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why would streamers give a shit about game publisher guidelines?

[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

Not following the guidelines has potential to damage relationships between them and the publisher. Affection existing and future access to pre release content / review content / sponsorship deals etc... . It potentially could damage relationships between others publishers as well.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

It was guidlines for the prerelease and free copies, if you buy it yourself you do not need to follow the guidelines.

[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Are these really strange restrictions though? Don't be an asshole, don't be an asshole, don't distract from the product that you're reviewing with other crap, don't use their product as a platform for politics.