this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
1266 points (98.7% liked)

politics

18852 readers
4259 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Non-paywall link: 12ft.io/https://www.thedailybeast.com/democrats-mock-donald-trump-as-too-old-to-runlike-he-did-to-joe-biden?ref=home?ref=home

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

I kind of fear what comes next after Trump (he is old and I can't imagine him serving a full term).

  1. Can Trump transfer his cult to a successor with a mere endorsement and forever continue a cycle of scrambling to vote for this "last" democrat.
  2. His cult fizzles out and the Republican party splits support over multiple candidates.
  3. A person like DeSantis (less of a narcisstic idiot and more a true representive of Republican hatred) takes over and is worse than Trump.
[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

He will never willingly let go of his control over his base. Trump doesn't give a single fuck about the MAGA movement beyond the fact that it is his own personal army of zombie sycophants.

His followers may be dogmatic about MAGA, but I can assure you that Trump himself is not. If he dropped dead tomorrow MAGA would instantaneously begin fizzling out, and it would fracture the Republican party.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The greatest gift trump could ever giver america is, when he loses the nomination in 2028, to run as a third party candidate. Hopefully he never lets go of his base.

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Hopefully before he dies he convinces his base to give themselves the Heavens Gate treatment so they can catch the golden limousine to hell right along with him.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Based on what my true-crime cult obsessed friend has said on the matter, option 2 is probably the most likely; though the party at large will always rally behind whoever the nominee is, because that's how Republicans operate.

DeSantis already tried to court the cult of Trump, and he failed because these cults of personality are entirely fixed around their leader. As my buddy described it, it's not like a hydra where you can cut the head off and the cult keeps going. Once the leader is gone, they fizzle out. Even in the case of endorsing a successor, I can't imagine the group having the same kind of following for the same reason - without Trump, the Flavor-Aid sours. There will be new leaders, but they'll have to work to sway the core voters in the way that Trump has. And the Flavor-Aid is a perfect metaphor, because Trump sounds exactly like Jim Jones according to my friend.

[–] ZeroTemp@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is the first time in the wild that I have seen someone correctly mention "Flavor-Aid" instead of "Kool-Aid" in reference to Jim Jones.

I would forever shame my friend if I didn't get that one right.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If anything, after Trump, he’ll be revered within the Republican party for years like Reagan was. WWTD “What Would Trump Do?” will become their new litmus test for whether a candidate is worthy or not. Republicans will try to show off their credentials of how aligned they were to “Trump’s values”.

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

At least they can finally stop pretending that they are "the party of Lincoln"

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That makes alot of sense. However, I'm worried the Republicans reliaze there are better candidates that represent "their morals". So maybe not DeSantis but someone closer. They also will have to vote for someone.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

Vance is just as scary as DeSantis imo, and we haven't seen him in an executive position yet.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cults of personality are never quite the same once the big personality passes. They tend to fragment, shrink, or otherwise fade away. Members may join other high control organizations, but they won't be united.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Depends... If he can successfully set up a family dynasty (would probably be Ivanka and Jared he passed it on to if we're being honest), and he stayed in office until he died before passing the torch (or perhaps even stepped back as an "elder statesman" for the last few years of his death so he can work on transitioning Donald Trump diehards into Trump diehards), I could see them making this work.

These people are in deep, and most of them will do anything he tells them to do.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can Trump transfer his cult to a successor with a mere endorsement and forever continue a cycle of scrambling to vote for this "last" democrat.

Trump cares about not going to jail and Trump in approximately equal amounts. No way he lets someone else take the wheel. If he somehow became president again he'd start looking at repealing the 22nd before he'd endorse anyone else.

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's a great point. However, I woulf think that there is a legal point where a president is to old and becomes mentally or physically incapable of being a president. Basically, someone in government would fight back and say this is a massive risk for the country's security.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That would be the time for the 25th. Doubt Vance would have the balls to try for it though.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I can't see Trump being the sort to try to build something beyond himself. I don't think he could see the point of trying to cultivate a successor; and even if he did, I think he would see them as potential competition - he'd likely try to sabotage them, if anything.

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I would love to see Trump sabotage them. A proper consequence for betting on chaos.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Trump has none of the admirable qualities of someone who's overcome a mental disability. He oozes neurotypical privilege.

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I know, I didn't let the media sway me into believing he was some genius charismatic dictator. I just think the man keeps failing upwards but his time is running out.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I mean... is extreme malignant narcissism considered neurotypical?

I kind of hope not.

He oozes wealth privilege (even if he doesn't have much left). Allows him to behave however he pleases.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He doesn't have extreme narcissism. That's a social disability. Does Trump look like his social faculties are impaired to you? His cognitive faculties are because of his dementia, but he's as charismatic as anyone, much as I hate to admit it. He's neurotypical.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A "social disability"? Is that from the DSM-5? I'll save you a quick Google: no. Even if it was, so what?

It's not a one or the other thing... There is zero chance of you ever convincing me that Donald Trump is not a narcissist. Maybe you're too young to remember the 90s, but this man has always been this way and his extreme, malignant narcissism has been a common theme for 40+ years.

I have never, once in my life, heard/saw Trump speak and thought, "this man has charisma." Sorry, just no. He just says the things the lowest common denominator wants to hear. If your foolish enough to confuse that with genuine charisma then I don't know what to say. Get out of the house more often.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago

Trump says what the lowest common denominator wants to hear. The lowest common denominator doesn't want to hear someone being visibly neurodivergent. Trump talks like a neurotypical. Like a privileged, white, racist asshole. He does not look like a hard working person who overcame a disability. Now stop complimenting him and realise he's ordinary filth.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
  1. If he passes it on to another shameless racist schoolyard bully con man, but really nobody matches up.
  2. If they were going to split, Donald should have been the limit. Actually, all Repubs will fall in line and vote for whomever their core voting base (far-right racists) wants. Their voting base just won't be as fired up.
  3. Desantis doesn't behave like a clown to get free airtime from all the networks. When he does get airtime, it's for backfiring stunts like giving immigrants free vacations to Martha's Vineyard with taxpayer money. IDK if that's a winning strategy.
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah, the longest lasting fascist country was spain which collapsed into a republic with the death of Francisco Franco.