this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
171 points (96.2% liked)

Games

16950 readers
766 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
171
Star Citizen's 'Everything Pack' Costs $48,000 (kotaku.com)
submitted 11 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
85 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I will say what i have said to another user here.

I did not intend to state that fomo was a crime. I didn't actually say that at any point.

I did say, and mean, that coercion is a crime. That is true from a legal standpoint.

I then gave my opinion, or my philosophical argument, that i believe that fomo is a form of coercion.

It's not complete gibberish, and i wasn't lying. You just misinterpreted what i meant.

I coild have been more clear in my argument, but it's disingenuous and kinda shitty of you to call it complete gibberish when you clearly understood what i was saying.

Stop trying to aggressively argue with me when we could just discuss this like normal people.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I then gave my opinion, or my philosophical argument, rhat i believe that fomo is a form or coercion.

This is not an opinion. It is not a "philosophical argument". It's a lie.

And it's absolutely incoherent gibberish. None of the words you are using mean anything close to what you're claiming they do. You make posts, using your arbitrary, completely incorrect definition of words no one but you knows, then need many, many posts of consistently changing your wrong definitions for anyone to even be able to follow. There's no path to a "discussion" when nothing you're posting tracks in any way.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

Yes, it is. You are wrong. If you can't follow it, that's your problem. Not mine.