this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
171 points (96.2% liked)

Games

16948 readers
621 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aidinthel@reddthat.com 58 points 11 months ago (10 children)

Every time I read about this game I wonder who the hell is giving them all this money.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

When I was in sales, I was always told "you can't sell it unless you offer it". There exists people who blow $48,000 on stupid stuff daily. What's the harm in offering a product to that very small demographic? Maybe you get lucky and make a $48,000 sale doing literally nothing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chozo@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I used to work with a guy who spent several thousand dollars on ships, most of which were scheduled for release 3+ years away from when he gave up the money. I think he still hasn't received some of them yet, but for some reason he keeps preordering even more ships. I would not be surprised if he spent $10k on this game already.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yata@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

They have a very dedicated flock of whales (the industry term for microtransaction addicts). They know they have them hooked, and they are obviously intent on bleeding those whales dry for everything they own.

I don't care how much I liked a game, if any publisher acted in this way I would never consider touching any of their games. This is absolutely criminal behaviour.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Idiots that will die on a hill defending the game, calling everyone who doubts it a "hater".

Useful idiots to the Star Citizen devs, that's for sure.

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't think there's many of those people, are you imagining up someone to hate or have genuinely experienced someone like that?

[–] teddy2021@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Mandaloregaming did a video on Star Citozen a few years ago that had a lot of discussion on the (bacterial) culture of the community of star citizen at the time. I don't know if it is relevant to the current community, though.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] filister@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago (11 children)

Isn't it time to get some regulations on m(i/a)cro transactions? This seems very illegal to me and it is exploiting people's addictions.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (7 children)

What really is probably illegal at this point is officially calling it all "pledges", i.e. "donations", and calling ships and stuff a "reward for the generous donation".

Dudes, this is literally what a purchase is. If I don't donate, I don't get a ship (or even a base game).

This seems to be a ground to sue the hell out of them.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (13 children)

What's illegal about it? Are they committing some kind of fraud? Is there some threat of harm if people don't buy it (i.e. extortion)? Where exactly is the potential crime?

Yeah, it would be pretty stupid to buy this in general, especially if you can't actually afford it, but being stupid isn't illegal.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Fomo is a form of coercion, and im pretty sure that's a crime in this case. The industry uses underhanded and shady practices to get people to spend money on things that have no intrinsic value.

I can see from your comment that its possible you haven't looked into this very much because you sound like me a few yesrs ago when i didnt see the harm as im not particularly susceptible to the ways they pedal microtransactions/in game purchases.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago (9 children)

lol it very obviously is not a crime. It's not even a civil action.

I don't support the whale business model for video games, but the idea that it's somehow a crime is a laughable lack of understanding of the law.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, fomo is not a form of coercion whatsoever. Here's the legal definition in the federal legal code:

coercion

(2) The term “coercion” means— (A) threats of serious harm to or physical restraint against any person; (B) any scheme, plan, or pattern intended to cause a person to believe that failure to perform an act would result in serious harm to or physical restraint against any person; or (C) the abuse or threatened abuse of law or the legal process.

So it requires the threat or implied threat of serious harm or abuse of the law against a person.

And no, not looking cool or being at the top of a game isn't "serious harm," you'd be laughed out of the courtroom and perhaps fined for wasting everyone's time if you tried to make that legal argument.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Im not making a legal argument... im making a philosophical one.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

The original context of this chain is a legal one:

Isn't it time to get some regulations on m(i/a)cro transactions? This seems very illegal to me and it is exploiting people's addictions.

Yes, you didn't say that, but you responded in that context. I asked "what is illegal about it?" and you directly replied with the note about coercion. To me, that clearly implies you think this is a form of legal coercion, and now you're backpedaling because I showed that's explicitly not true. You're moving the goalposts.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Google tells me "fomo" is probably an acronym for "fear of missing out" (it'd probably help make your points clearer if you didn't obfuscate them behind acronyms the people you're talking might not be familiar with, by the way).

Supposing that's the case... what is there to miss out on in Star Citizen..? Any package above the base ones (which get you the games for about $40) give you absolutely nothing that you can't get in-game (with the arguable exception of a few limited edition ships, which in any case shouldn't offer any in-game advantages and can probably be considered cosmetic)... you're not missing out by not buying them...

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 7 points 11 months ago (8 children)

Exploiting peoples addictions is what literally drives capitalism.

[–] spez_@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Plus making people pay for essentials by gatekeeping everything behind the owner class

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Koen967@feddit.nl 22 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Microtransactions are entering the endgame.

[–] Dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works 31 points 11 months ago

They invented megatransactions.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 5 points 11 months ago

Macrotransactions

[–] Computerchairgeneral@kbin.social 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I think the craziest thing for me, if I'm reading this right, is that the pack includes all ships released and concepted. So you're paying for ships that aren't even in the game yet? You just have concept art and the promise that they might be in the game?

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago

Pinky swear bro, we’ll make em

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 7 points 11 months ago

Star Citizen has long history of ship pre-purchases long before release

[–] msmc101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I didn't even know people still cared about this shit show

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Just play Elite Dangerous and be done with this scam already.

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh yes, Space Truck Simulator 2

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›