this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
321 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7499 readers
8 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
321
Defederating was the right call. The_Donald is being hosted on sh.itjust.works. (i.imgur.com)
submitted 1 year ago by Jeze3D@beehaw.org to c/chat@beehaw.org
377 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The admin of sh.itjust.works has been approached but as of yet has failed to reply to concerned Lemmy users. I’m glad Beehaw admins look out for us by cutting off instances that host communities like this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ffmike@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why, just today the notably left-wing Supreme Court upheld speech restrictions on speech encouraging immigration.

[–] TooTallSol@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Why, just today the notably left-wing Supreme Court upheld speech restrictions on speech encouraging immigration."

That's a lie. From the article:

The Supreme Court on Friday upheld a provision of federal law that prohibits the encouragement of illegal immigration for financial gain, ruling against a man who ran an organization falsely claiming that noncitizens could obtain citizenship in the US through adult adoption.

Wonder why you left that part out.

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

The literal next sentence in the article is

The case raised significant free speech concerns in the context of a law meant to forbid individuals from encouraging illegal immigration.

Why did you make this reply? What are you trying to raise?