this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
437 points (93.3% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4814 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The poll found 50% of Democrats approve of how Biden has navigated the conflict while 46% disapprove — and the two groups diverge substantially in their views of U.S. support for Israel. Biden’s support on the issue among Democrats is down slightly from August, as an AP-NORC poll conducted then found that 57% of Democrats approved of his handling of the conflict and 40% disapproved.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It seemed to me (looking in from the outside) that he merely kept on doing what the US had always done.

Apparently it's the public opinion that has changed, while the diplomacy plodded on in it's usual well-travelled trail.

[–] Joe-Blow240@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Who knew that Millennials would hate casual genocide?

[–] Milksteaks@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Millenials are killing the casual genocide industry, what's next the military industrial complex??

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, that's kind of the biggest complaint about Biden and the whole moderate wing...

They act like nothing ever changes and they don't have to react. There's a shit ton of urgent problems they just won't address because they don't give a shit.

They don't honestly have any goals or things to accomplish other than being elected.

So why are we still electing them? The only positive to electing a moderate Dem is a Republican doesn't win. It's why America has been steadily backsliding for decades, and if we keep electing them it'll keep happening.

Best case scenario, politicians like Biden are a "pause button" on America's collapse. And for the people who still have decades of life left, that's just not good enough for us.

[–] snownyte@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's why I voted Biden. I voted Biden in the general election (but voted Bernie in the primaries) because I wanted everyone out of the nightmare circus that was Trump and the Republican regime. A regime we haven't seen so devastatingly retarded since the Bush era. Right now, it's way too dangerous to allow Republicans total control. It's like, look what they do when they're in Congress. Look what they do when they control state governments. They are totally in another realm of reality far off from what we classify as normal today.

I wish we would've ended up with Andrew Yang at least if we couldn't have Bernie. I like Democrats because with Democrats, the worse that they can do is just make small mistakes but mistakes that can be repaired. If we elect a single Republican, that's 4 more years of irreversible damage we're not going to recover from and it'll take over maybe several terms of presidencies to fix maybe a handful of problems.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I mean, so am I.

But I also don't get drunk at bars and then drive home. Lots of other people don't make that choice, even though it seems super obvious.

We can pretend those people don't exist, we can complain that they should know better, but they're still going to make the same decision if we do either of those things.

So why not try running candidates that will actually try to do the right thing once elected instead demanding they vote for whoever is less terrible?

For some people, voting is a huge hassle and positive motivation works better than the threat of a potential negative

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

The Trump administration made Bush II look like FDR

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

From out here, we don't follow US politics all that closely. But it seems that the extremes (republicans and religious, they go hand in hand I suppose) in your country are so wild that it's probably also quite difficult to get anything done.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the extremes

What exactly do you mean?

Like, the far right obviously.

But whose the other extreme? The progressives wanting the same shit every other developed country already has?

Since you said "from out here" I'm curious what you meant.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But whose the other extreme? The progressives wanting the same shit every other developed country already has?

You have a choice of extremes, nazis, christian extremists, republicans that want to destroy the planet "just because", a variety of other lesser far rightwing political subgroups... And no, progressives aren't a part of it. As elsewhere, the troublesome ones are all on the right.

I'm not in the US, I don't know the intimate details of what goes on over there.

"Out here" is the wasteland that isn't the US, as seen by US people.

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 6 points 1 year ago

I think I see the confusion. Nazis and Christian extremists are the modern Republican party. The only two parties we can support are rightwing extremists or milquetoast centrists. They're a united front of crazy.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t have any hard data on this but I felt like the 2014 Gaza War was a turning point. It’s the first time I really remember a narrative change in America. The traditional media, government officials, etc. were as pro-war and pro-Israel as ever but civilians in Gaza were sharing dramatic photos and videos on social media.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Europe has always been much less radical on that issue. But I remember that around 2010 or so, the Palestinians definitely ramped up their communication efforts towards the international media. So that probably had an impact.