this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
223 points (87.3% liked)

World News

38979 readers
3628 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] oiez@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

Speaking as an American Jew, Hamas should release the hostages. Until they do, a ceasefire feels impossible.

[–] tomatopathe@sh.itjust.works 73 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Hamas doesn't give a fuck about peace, ceasefires, children, or anything else.

That doesn't mean Israel should get carte blanche to do whatever they want. Let's not forget that prominent members of the current Israeli government have expressed very clear genocidal desires of their own.

[–] Squid@lemmings.world 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think we should just shove both leaders into a submersible

[–] tomatopathe@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Honestly? Yeah I don't see any way around this than to simply predicate all aid to the region on conditions.

  1. Israel on the demand that not one more brick be laid anywhere outside Israel's borders and a plan with enforcement mechanisms to dismantle the settlements that are there in order to guarantee the possibility of a sustainable Palestinian state with an economy under their own control (I.e that trade, commerce, construction, monetary policy be Palestinian and not imposed by Israel). That reparations be paid to families of the victims of this bombing campaign and settler violence over the years, that those who perpetrated violence be brought to justice.

  2. Palestine on the condition that they renounce the right of return, that they apprehend and surrender all militants to an international tribunal, that they recognize Israel, that they pay reparations to the families of Israelis that have been killed over the years.

  3. Egypt and Jordan on the demand that they participate in the enforcement of the above.

  4. for all parties, that Jerusalem be declared either an international city, or joint capital (split East-West).

  5. that Iran be completely isolated from the region. This is a tough one, they have their fingers deep within Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and Lebanon.

It's unclear how anything else can work.

If this requires a permanent UN military mission with the right to shoot to kill any threat all along the border of both Palestine and Israel, I'm fine with it. If it means Israel bitches and moans about how unfair it is, who cares. It's about time they respected and enforced the law. If it means Palestinians need to fight to dismantle their own militant orgs and fight for peace, at least they will have a light at the end of that tunnel instead of the despair of the past 70 years (and earlier too, tbh).

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Palestine on the condition that they renounce the right of return…

One wonders why it should be Palestine that gives up this right. Remember, it was Israeli paramilitaries that took over the Palestine Mandate despite (admittedly fucked up) plans by the UN for after British colonial rule left.

Like, your argument is basically fate-acompli. It’s a horribly complicated thing, but unilaterally evicting one party from a homeland isn’t going to lead to peace.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Renouncing right on return

Yeah that's not happening, and it shouldn't.

[–] tomatopathe@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Israelis will never accept to become a minority. It's as simple as that.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So palistinians should give up on access to their (equally ancient) homeland?

[–] itscozydownhere@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s wrong. But a lot of past wrong wars set current borders and taken land. At some point you just need to accept it. Just in the ‘800 Europe was completely different and yet no one cares now (mostly)

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The difference between 800s Europe and 1947 Palestine is about 1100 years and the fact that 1947 is still in living memory.

[–] itscozydownhere@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry I meant 1800/1900. It’s living memory yes but people will keep dying otherwise. Don’t get me wrong I hate it. As much as I hate Russia for trying to do something similar in Ukraine

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People will keep dying and it will keep being israel's fault. This is the reality do not twist it.

[–] itscozydownhere@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Agree to disagree

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 year ago

“Afrikaners will never accept losing the majority to blacks” - South African apologists in the 1980s.

If your nation depends on apartheid, it must be rebuilt on a foundation of justice.

[–] oiez@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

You know this is a good plan because all the orthodox hardliners on both the Israeli and Palestinian side would hate it.

[–] Marsupial@quokk.au 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, nah.

That option lets Israel get away with everything and punishes everyone else in the region.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I’m much more in the aid is reduced pending peaceful single state solution with Palestinians and Israelis having equal legal standing and protections

Is it going to be happy? Fuck no. Setting aside grudges and ending feuds is awful and nobody likes it. But hospitals stop being bombed in response which sure is nice.

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

They can set up grievance courts to deal with the hatred and resentment like Rwanda did.

[–] itscozydownhere@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Beautiful. A dream, but would be great

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 5 points 1 year ago

And i thought my plan of putting both in a room with only water and only release them when there's a peace treaty is brilliant.

Visiting titanic will be nice.

[–] samokosik@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 year ago

I agree. Both leaders are just way too radical to find a solution.

[–] DaCookeyMonsta@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

Hamas should go die in a ditch. Doesn't mean Israel should murder civilians wholesale.

[–] Machinist3359@kbin.social 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As an american jew, hostages don't justify genocide. Never again means never again.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“No talks until you give up your leverage”

Preconditions for a ceasefire mean you aren’t serious about a ceasefire.

[–] itscozydownhere@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do you think Hamas cares to “talk” or “negotiate” anything?

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

why else take hostages and spend resources keeping them alive lol

[–] itscozydownhere@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe they thought they wouldn’t be bombed with hostages 💁‍♂️

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty silly to assume that if Israel bombs refugee camps and hospitals.

[–] itscozydownhere@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, in fact they’re pretty dumb

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean yes. Being bombed is usually not a good time.

[–] itscozydownhere@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Do you think they don’t like it? Israel warns when and where they’re bombing by also hijacking palestinians media. Hamas makes it impossible for the civilians to flee. They want them to die so they can blame Israel for the casualties. Israel sucks. Hamas sucks more

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

The thing is: Their only leverage is the hostages (which Bibi apparently wants to bomb to death). Without leverage you can't really have negotiations.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Speaking as another American Jew, killing innocent people should not be the response to a hostage situation.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Yes, and how do you think they plan on negotiating for said ceasefire?

spoilerwith hostages lol

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 11 points 1 year ago

In return for the thousands of Palestinians imprisoned without trial, right?

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

At this point Israel might have actually killed more Jews in Gaza than Hamas. Hostages too if they don't stop the indiscriminate shelling.

[–] stella@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Are you saying Israel is justified in killing thousands of children because Hamas has about 100 hostages?

Weird how the Palestinians should always be mad at Hamas for Israel's retaliation, but Israelis shouldn't be mad at their government for Hamas' retaliation.

[–] qnick@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

The fire was ceased on October 6th