this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
802 points (97.0% liked)

Reddit

17656 readers
234 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



:::spoiler Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 139 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I got banned for telling someone it's important to check for cancer, on a post about a sports person that died from rectal cancer, and I was banned permanently for "harassment".

I appealed and lost.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 69 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Yeah, bad actors have weaponised the harassment rule to get people banned. I was banned because a tankie sub - that I had previously thought was cool - banned me from out of nowhere with an automated message and no explanation. Putting 2 & 2 together it was clearly for an anti-tankie post I made on a different sub. Literally a kind of harassment in itself. When I said "What the fuck?" In my reply, I was banned reddit-wide.

Like they've gotta just be fishing for anything they can call harasment to get their ideological enemies kicked.

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago

The distinction between mod subreddit bans and site wide bans is basically gone

[–] oroboros@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I got banned from greenandpleasent the same time Russia invaded Ukraine because it was taken over by a bunch of boot lickers and likely actual paid russian shills, probably some of the same crowd hosting hexbear et al. And got a site wide ban soon after...

[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh I got banned from the site. Reddit admins banned me lmao.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I got banned from the site too.

[–] ThePenitentOne@discuss.online 2 points 1 year ago

Anybody that ever said anything that could be classed as controversial has been if someone was salty enough to report them. Reddit went from corporate influenced to corporate interested above all else.

[–] jcit878@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

yep, and yet somehow reddit never does anything about the report abuse for the 'self help' thing which id get dozens of PM's a day about at one point, reported them and nothing was ever done about it

[–] brb@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (6 children)
[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Its an epithet for authcoms (authoritarian communists) and MLs (Marxists-Leninists). Essentially referring to justifications of using tanks / violence to quash uprisings or dissent.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fans of this (and not the guy standing there):

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Years of being on reddit has conditioned me to always respond to this picture with

So brave

I literally cannot stop myself from posting it.

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In a weird way, it's kind of "so left wing it curled round the back and ended up on the far right".

If you think of "left wing" as in "we support Pol Pot, Stalin, Putin etc" rather than "let's open a community-run vegan art cafe to promote understanding between diverse social groups".

Wikipaedia article here

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

“let’s open a community-run vegan art cafe to promote understanding between diverse social groups”.

It wasn't a vegan art cafe, but the town I grew up in opened a community-run "Peace and Justice Center" that was a direct evolution from the protest camp that was set up at the start of the 1992 Iraq war. It lasted about 2 months because they had no idea what a peace and justice center was supposed to do. They did let several homeless people sleep there in violation of zoning regulations, though.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I agree with your characterisation, but obviously I think that version of left-wing isn't really left. It's state capitalism with a red flag.

That said, I'd add that the anarchist and other libertarian leftists (ancaps stole the word libertarian from the left btw) absolutely have revolutionary aims and activities, we aren't just sitting around singing kumbaya. I didn't sense you were trying to belittle us but I wanted to add that.

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're right to give it a little more detail - my slightly silly summary skipped over a lot.

Definitely not trying to belittle anyone, though I am slightly poking fun at myself :)

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Got it, that was the vibe you gave off but also since we're trying to educate I thought I'd be a bit pedantic about it :)

[–] Fosheze@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's two definitions, the former means redfash who overlook the fascist elements of former socialisms, particularly those of Marxist-Leninist orientation. (the fact they use tankie rather than redfash should tell you they're not entirely comfortable using fascist as a pejorative, want to guess why?)

The latter is basically a dog whistle used by reactionaries to mean communist. Basically a synonym of "woke" for those not overtly racist and applies to anyone with left-of-hitler politics. Think your blue maga types who swear they're progressive.

Regardless, the word was invented by the CIA to sew division among the left and should not be used by anyone.

[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you approach things from a scientific perspective, the meaning of harassment is just "political speech I don't like". Some kinds of political speech, like protests and appeals, are important and should be allowed, but can easily be labelled harassment. Other kinds of political speech, like sexual harassment or hate speech, are bad. "Harassment" as a word isn't a useful one. Two people having a fight are harassing each other, regardless of who's right. We have created a society that hates political speech and welcomes the use of state and corporation violence to suppress dissenting politics.

I don't say this from a place of callousness. I've been a victim of the most vicious harassment and it's given me PTSD. And what I learned from the experience is, talented manipulators and people with social power will always benefit from being able to call political speech harassment.

[–] jarfil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

harassment is just "political speech I don't like"

Some communities on Lemmy have switched to calling it "misinformation". As in: you provide links to reputable sources to support your point, and it's "misinformation".

Harassment seems to be more of a label for "too many people downvoted you, and you still dared to answer".

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

That explains why a troll tried ban baiting me for "disinformation" when I said something they didn't like.

[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's better. Misinformation covers situations like defamation and many kinds of hate speech. Although there still needs to be a solution for stalking and sexual harassment, as long as it doesn't overlap and outlaw protest or deplatforming.

[–] jarfil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Misinformation covers situations like defamation and many kinds of hate speech.

Not really:

  • Misinformation: “false information that is spread, regardless of whether there is intent to mislead.”
  • Disinformation: “deliberately misleading or biased information; manipulated narrative or facts; propaganda.”

The difference is between "I don't believe you, so you get banned" vs. "I think you're trying to mislead people, so you get banned".

Misinformation allows banning any information a mod believes to be "false", for whatever reason, no matter the proof.

(PS: if any mod doesn't agree with these definitions, they could remove this comment based on "misinformation")

[–] waterbogan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

God that's actually worse than my banning (I posted a Google Streetview link of a layby). Incredible. Has anyone ever appealed and won? Ever?

[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I won my appeal once. I was banned for "hate speech". I was literally being 100% sarcastic against someone who was truly being a hateful shithead. I assume I was banned by an idiot who doesn't understand sarcasm exists, but unbanned by someone who has talked to another human before.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Person: "nien! slur slur"

You: "don't be a cracker"

Reddit: "Your comment has violated hate speech rules"

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, I did. But only because multiple subreddit mods, including all of the mods in the subreddit that triggered the ban, got behind me due to the bullshit nature of the ban.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

I really need context before I can get on the "mods bad" wagon for this one