this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
206 points (95.6% liked)

Linux

47343 readers
1157 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

if you could pick a standard format for a purpose what would it be and why?

e.g. flac for lossless audio because...

(yes you can add new categories)

summary:

  1. photos .jxl
  2. open domain image data .exr
  3. videos .av1
  4. lossless audio .flac
  5. lossy audio .opus
  6. subtitles srt/ass
  7. fonts .otf
  8. container mkv (doesnt contain .jxl)
  9. plain text utf-8 (many also say markup but disagree on the implementation)
  10. documents .odt
  11. archive files (this one is causing a bloodbath so i picked randomly) .tar.zst
  12. configuration files toml
  13. typesetting typst
  14. interchange format .ora
  15. models .gltf / .glb
  16. daw session files .dawproject
  17. otdr measurement results .xml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.world 45 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Literally any file format except PDF for documents that need to be edited. Fuck Adobe and fuck Acrobat

[–] LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Isn't the point of PDF that it can't (or, perhaps more accurately, shouldn't) be edited after the fact? It's supposed to be immutable.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 12 points 11 months ago

Unless you have explicitly digitally-signed the PDF, it's not immutable. It's maybe more-annoying to modify, but one shouldn't rely on that.

And there are ways to digitally-sign everything, though not all viewing software has incorporated signature verification.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 7 points 11 months ago

No, it's too preserve formatting when distributed. Editing is absolutely possible, always were, it's just annoying to parse the structure when trying to preserve the format as you make changes

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, although there's probably a culture or convention around that.

Originally the idea was that it's a format which can contain fonts and other things so it will be rendered the same way on different devices even if those devices don't have those fonts installed. The only reason it's not commonly editable that I'm aware of is that it's a fairly arcane proprietary spec.

Now we have the openspec odt which can embed all the things, so pdf editing just doesn't really seem to have any support.

The established conventions around pdfs do kind of amaze me. Like contracts get emailed for printing & signing all the time. In many cases it would be trivial to edit the pdf and return your edited copy which the author is unlikely to ever read.

[–] WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Hold on. I'm applying for a mortgage and I want the bank to pay off my loan for me after 6 months of payments.

[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Why would you use acrobat? I haven't used it in many years and use PDFs all the time

[–] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Depends on the platform I'm on. There are so many options. SumatraPDF on windows, whatever default app pop os has, preview on Mac, builtin android PDF viewer. I assume you're on windows because you mentioned acrobat. There are several options beside sumatra. I think many are decent.

[–] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Ah I was more looking for alternative editors rather than viewers, I usually just use my web browser to view them

[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ah, yeah I normally would only need to do that in the context of signing a contract, which I do using Gimp or Photoshop.

Have you tried these? https://www.lifewire.com/best-free-pdf-editors-4147622

[–] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I have not, I’ll give some of them a try!

[–] piexil@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Firefox can edit PDFs , although I wouldn't be surprised if it's not in depth

[–] iegod@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is foxit still around? I didn't mind that one on windows.

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Yup an it also one of best for linux

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

Acrobat Reader is actually great for filling out forms.

Even if the "pdf" is actually just a potato quality photo of what was at some time a form, you can still fill it out in Acrobat Reader.

Generally in windows I prefer sumatra pdf as a reader, but I keep acrobat around for this purpose.