this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
583 points (98.2% liked)

Work Reform

9823 readers
1519 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Unemployment has to jump 40 to 50 percent, in my view. We need to see some pain in the economy. We need to remind people that they work for the employer, not the other way around

What a fucking asshole! True "we need to show those uppity peasant who's boss" energy 🀬

[–] NoNotLikeThat@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sounds like he's mad he can't afford as many yachts.

[–] ours@lemmy.film 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you can't put your yacht on a bigger yacht, how is life worth living?

[–] legios@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Pfft, you need a golf course on a yacht in a pool on a house on a yacht!

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Employee and employer work TOGETHER. I would love to meet this guy in person, real let them eat cake energy. Anyway, where's my guillotine sharpener.?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Employee and employer work TOGETHER

Sounds like commie talk to me. How long have you been a member of the Communist Party of America? /s

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The thing is, the workers work for money, not for the employer.

The employer is just a middleman that can easily be replaced.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Indeed. Anyone earning more than 40k annual salary belongs to the richest 3% in the world. Get ready gringos, we third world countries are coming for you

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

When we have nothing to lose, then we have no problem eating the billionaires.

[–] rainynight65@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Tim Gurner is talking like someone who has never been an employee, much less experienced actual poverty.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You talking about me? Because you'd be wrong on both counts. That's part of why I despise greedy and power-hungry billionaires (but I repeat myself) like him..

Or did you mean him?

[–] rainynight65@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I meant him. Apologies if that came across the wrong way. I'll edit my post for clarity.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Fair enough 😁

[–] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If billionaires ruined the economy in such a way that 50 percent of people couldn’t afford to feed their families then I like to think that people would simply eat the billionaires.

But that’s wishful thinking and seeing how people interact in public and online makes me think that way too many people still think billionaires are awesome.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If billionaires ruined the economy in such a way that 50 percent of people couldn’t afford to feed their families

What do you mean "if"? They're well on the way already and it's getting worse, not better.

then I like to think that people would simply eat the billionaires.

Problem with that is that owning everything also includes bodyguards and even de facto private armies.

way too many people still think billionaires are awesome.

Unfortunately you're absolutely right.