this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
471 points (97.8% liked)
Asklemmy
43940 readers
682 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Autonomous driving vehicles. I've worked in software for over a decade and if their internal processes are anything like the places I've worked then no thanks
It's worse. They use "machine learning". So nobody can know the failure modes before they happen.
We still don't have a reliable enough way to automate trains, and that's a (mostly) centrally controlled and closed system. The driving assists like automatic braking can at least be tested to a reasonable confidence, but I'd rather drive drunk than sit in a fully autonomous vehicle.
I work in IT and you can basically track enthusiasm about self driving cars along the lines of technical knowledge
What always surprised me was the bigger the company, the worse the code base.
I support that point of view, but you also have to compare their performance to human drivers. We often have the expectation that technology have to be perfect (which it isn't). Since you also have an IT background you know this pretty well probably. But if it's safer than human drivers it could as well be an improvement.