this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
847 points (88.3% liked)

Memes

45193 readers
2209 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

what the fuck do words even mean anymore, read marx jesus christ

I used to think that Marx was overrated because I never needed to read him but holy shit it's clear that 95% of the populace cannot form coherent ideologies without being taught them

[–] DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Tankie usually refers to Marxism-Leninism (as well the ideologies that derived from it such as Maoism). But there are communist ideologies that don't derive from ML such as Orthodox Marxism, trotskyism, libertarian Marxism, bulshevism, etc.

[–] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tankie usually refers to Marxism-Leninism

no it usually refers to whatever the fuck the person posting it seems to think it is, there is not a coherent label for it.

Orthodox Marxism, trotskyism, libertarian Marxism, bulshevism, etc.

Oh cool, which societies use those?

[–] DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

no it usually refers to whatever the fuck the person posting it seems to think it is, there is not a coherent label for it.

Why are you letting libs define everything? You and I both know they're dumbasses and shouldn't be taken seriously.

Oh cool, which societies use those?

Anyone could have said the same to Marx about communism at any point in his life, as he died before the October revolution.

[–] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anyone could have said the same to Marx about communism at any point in his life, as he died before the October revolution.

the difference is you named a bunch of dead ideologies that will never be revived, ML is literally the only form of marxism still flourishing

[–] DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Speculation and also not relevant.

[–] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

how is that speculation, its material; Im only interested in ideologies with proven merit.

Im willing to take a chance of a synthesis on a new idea, but it has to actually offer people something.

[–] DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's speculation because you don't know what the future holds. And just because you're not interested in a particular ideology or don't think it has merit doesn't make it any less communist.

My only point is that words do in fact have meaning, Marxist-Leninism is not synonymous with communism. Therefore, one can be anti-tankie without being anti-communist.

[–] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago

You can be, but that would be called 'idealism' and no one outside of western liberal spheres will take you seriously.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

"Orthodox Marxists" can hardly be said to exist, because the classical formulation of Marxism has long been empirically refuted, hence the need for new schools. Even Luxembourgists are more respectable than "Orthodox Marxists".

[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

have you confused the internet for a court room?

[–] DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nope, just trying to have a rational, good faith discussion.

[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your position is idealist and neither rational nor good faith - don't expect others to meet you with merits your position lacks.

[–] DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't see how acknowledging that other branches of communism and Marxism exist is idealism, bad faith, or irrational.

[–] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because you only advocate for ideas that dont exist in reality, and deride actually existing marxism as 'tankie', you can continue to advocate for idealist positions, but it requires you to build a coherent movement around it otherwise its just masterbation and contrarianism.

[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's not what you've done, though, is it? If you're unable to describe your own arguments, how can you possibly hope to engage with other people?

[–] o_d@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Why are you letting libs define everything? You and I both know they're dumbasses and shouldn't be taken seriously.

Yeah I'm sure everyone in the lemmyverse is using the word tankie to refer to those of us who support the 1956 Soviet intervention in Hungary /s

[–] geikei@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

How would Trotskyism be any less "authoritarian" Than marxism leninism ? Also almost every claims on some level to be "orthodox marxist", lenin most of all and MLs as well

[–] o_d@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Omg read theory dammit!

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Telling someone to read Marx to understand modern day socialism is like telling someone to read Newton to understand modern day physics tbh.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, you're right. It's also important to read Lenin's works on imperialism to understand modern socialism. It's important to study Mao as well.

[–] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no, its not

its like telling someone they should read the bible if they want to be christian.

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah, you should read Marx if you want to understand the historical development of socialist ideas, but if that’s where your reading ends, then your ideas are stuck in the past.

Socialism isn’ta religious dogma that is inflexible and unchanging. It’s an intellectual idea that grows and becomes more refined over time.

[–] GreatWhiteNope@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They’re saying that your take is so incoherent that you need to develop a foundational understanding of the basics.

Before you can learn calculus, you need to learn arithmetic so you don’t end up saying things like 2 != sqrt(4)

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ve read Marx, I’ve moved on from Marx. You guys clearly haven’t; or at least, you haven’t moved on from Lenin.

[–] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I never stop reading marxist stuff, im fully up to date thanks.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

Socialism isn't an intellectual idea though. It's not an idea we put on the world, it's a real movement that abolishes the present state of things.

[–] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you read lenin, mao, sankara, deng, marx or any sociological text on neo-marxism?

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago

just some guys and dudes

[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You just said this lol

I’ve read Marx, I’ve moved on from Marx. You guys clearly haven’t; or at least, you haven’t moved on from Lenin.

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

That’s why it’s funny