LittleLordLimerick

joined 1 year ago
[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You seem to have the assumption that they’re not. And that “helping society” is anything more than a happy accident that results from “making big profits”.

It's not an assumption. There's academic researchers at universities working on developing these kinds of models as we speak.

Are you asking me whether it’s a good idea to give up the concept of “Privacy” in return for an image classifier that detects how much film grain there is in a given image?

I'm not wasting time responding to straw men.

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

If enforcement means big tech companies have to throw out models because they used personal information without knowledge or consent, boo fucking hoo

A) this article isn't about a big tech company, it's about an academic researcher. B) he had consent to use the data when he trained the model. The participants later revoked their consent to have their data used.

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

ok i guess you don’t get to use private data in your models too bad so sad

You seem to have an assumption that all AI models are intended for the sole benefit of corporations. What about medical models that can predict disease more accurately and more quickly than human doctors? Something like that could be hugely beneficial for society as a whole. Do you think we should just not do it because someone doesn't like that their data was used to train the model?

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A ghoul isn’t “an attractive and intelligent person” you absolute pumpkin.

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's not how the world works in the year 2023. Isolationism just isn't a conceivable possibility. All countries are interconnected, and what's happening in one country influences what's happening in other countries in major ways.

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think you said anything meaningfully different from what I already said.

You do not consider the abhorrent unethical nature of certain actions as being a valid argument against taking those actions in the pursuit of establishing a communist society. The only criticism you'll entertain is that certain actions may be ineffective or inefficient at accomplishing that goal.

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

No worries, that’s not what makes someone a tankie

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

That’s why it’s funny

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, I fully know you as a person, including everything you've ever done and everything you ever will do, from just a couple of internet comments, and I judge you useless. So give up. Stop being a socialist. I, an internet stranger, know you are not contributing anything of value, so why bother?

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No, who are those people?

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ve read Marx, I’ve moved on from Marx. You guys clearly haven’t; or at least, you haven’t moved on from Lenin.

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Well your political activism starts and ends with posting Lenin quotes in online discussion boards, so I don’t know that you are in any position to be calling other people useless.

view more: next ›