Asklemmy

43757 readers

2316 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

336

Why is everything going to shit? (feddit.de)

submitted 1 year ago by Knusper@feddit.de to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

116 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Was just trying to explain to someone why everything is going to shit, specifically companies, and realized, I don't fully get it either.

I've got the following explanation. The sentences marked with "???" are were I'm lost. Anyone mind telling me, if they're correct and if so, why?

The past few years, central banks were giving out interest rates of 0% or even negative percentages. Regular banks would not quite pass this on, but you could still loan money and give it back later with no real interest payments.

This lead to lots of people investing in companies. As long as those companies paid out more money than those low interest rates, it was worthwhile. But at the same time, this meant companies didn't have to be profitable, because they could pay out investors from money that other investors gave them???

This has stopped being the case, as central banks are hiking interest rates again, to combat inflation???

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Knusper@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thanks! I guess, I posed this question badly as most of the other folks came here to philosophize or rant.

If you're doing those moonshots and a company isn't profitable, does that mean you don't get paid out in the meantime? You just keep your money in there, because the company's valuation rises, which makes your x% company ownership worth more, right?

Right, and with inflation, we just need to slow it, i.e. stretch it over a longer period of time, because we have automatic processes in place to adjust for a certain rate of inflation over a fixed period of time (like for example work contracts that include an automatic pay raise every year).

[–] amio@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess, I posed this question badly as most of the other folks came here to philosophize or rant.

Not really, that's just how this place is.

[–] Knusper@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Well, part of posing it badly was to post it to AskLemmy, because yeah, this is more just an opinion community. I probably should've gone to some finance-related community, but couldn't think of one, off the top of my head...

[–] Lauchs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

does that mean you don't get paid out in the meantime?

Usually, yup. Investment deal structure varies but generally that's the case. You can sometimes borrow money to buy out an original investor, which is what I think what part of your earlier explanation bit meant.

Right, and with inflation, we just need to slow it, i.e. stretch it over a longer period of time

Basically, yeah. We kind of just accept there will be some degree of inflation... I don't recall any arguments as to why zero inflation would be bad but I think inflation's existenxe is just a fact of economic life. So we want to spread it out in an orderly fashion so those processes you correctly listed can quietly do their thing.