this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
410 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

59201 readers
3643 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

New Footage Shows Tesla On Autopilot Crashing Into Police Car After Alerting Driver 150 Times::Six officers who were injured in the crash are suing Tesla despite the fact that the driver was allegedly impaired

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daikiki@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I have a lot of trouble understanding how the NTSB (or whoever's ostensibly in charge of vetting tech like this) is allowing these not-quite self driving cars on the road. The technology doesn't seem mature enough to be safe yet, and as far as I can tell, nobody seems to have the authority or be willing to use that authority to make manufacturers step back until they can prove their systems can be integrated safely into traffic.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago

It's just ADAS - essentially fancy cruise control. There are a number of autonomous vehicle companies who are carefully and successfully developing real self-driving technology, and Tesla should be censured and forbidden for labeling their assistance software as "full self-driving." It's damaging the real industry.

[–] RushingSquirrel@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's similar to cruise control. Cruise control can be dangerous because someone could fall asleep (not having to manage your speed can afford up sleepiness) and the car wouldn't slow down.

In my opinion, those options are all the driver's responsibility to know their own limit and understand that the tool is just a tool and you are responsible to making sure your driving is safe for others. Tesla autopilot adds a ton of safety features that avoid a lot of collisions based on lacking attention, sleepiness, and actively avoiding other drivers faults. But it's still just a tool and the driver is responsible of their own car and driving.

[–] daikiki@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The difference is that cruise control will maintain your speed, but 'autopilot' may avoid or slow down for obstacles. Maybe it avoids obstacles 90% of the time or 99% of the time. It apparently avoids obstacles enough that people can get lulled into a false sense of security, but once in a while it slams into the back of a stationary vehicle at highway speed.

It's easy to say it's the driver's responsibility, and ultimately it is, of course, but in practice, a system that works almost all of the time but occasionally causally kills somebody is very dangerous indeed, and saying it's all the driver's fault isn't really realistic or fair.

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A lot of modern cruise control systems will match the speed of the car in front of you and stop if they stop. They'll also keep the car in the current lane.

It's frustrating that Tesla's system can't detect a stationary police car in the middle of the road... but at the same time apparently that's quite a difficult thing to do (without false positives, where the car would suddenly slam on the brakes and stop for no reason).

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's actually not that hard to do, but Tesla is not willing to spend the necessary time and resources to solve the hard problems.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Maybe it avoids obstacles 90% of the time or 99% of the time.

99 is not enough!

99 means many many more dead people.

You need to go for 99.99%

[–] ilickfrogs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actually it's absolutely realistic and fair. I don't like Musk, or Tesla for that matter. But they make it pretty damn clear that you're 100% responsible for the vehicle when using that feature. Anyone who assumes they don't need to pay attention is a moron and should be held responsible. If a 747 autopilot system started telling the pilot to take control and they didn't we wouldn't blame the manufacturer, we'd blame the shitty pilot that didn't do their job.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I can’t wait to get smacked by a Tesla beta tester and have everyone debate whether the car or the driver is responsible for my innards being spread across 4 lanes. Progress!

[–] masterairmagic@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

The problem with Tesla is that their entire marketing is based on "Our cars drives themselves".

[–] Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

It's not "not-quite-self-driving" though, it's literal garbage. It's cruise control, lane assist and brake assist. The robot vision in use is horrible.

There are Tesla engineers bad mouthing the system openly.

Musk is a scammer and they need to issue an apology for all of the claims around autopilot, probably pay a great deal of money, and then change the name and advertising around it.

Oh, and also this guy should never drive again.

[–] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

$$$ that's how.