Work Reform

9963 readers

1192 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.

Our Goals

Higher wages for underpaid workers.
Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
Better and fewer working hours.
Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

seeCseas@lemmy.world

tintory@lemm.ee

TinMod@lemmy.world

829

Almost all remote-work news is negative now but was positive in the beginning of the pandemic. Have you noticed this or am I going crazy? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by ItsMeForRealNow@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world

109 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Earlier in the pandemic many news and magazine organizations would proudly write about how working from home always actually can lead to over working and being too "productive". I am yet to collect some evidence on it but I think we remember a good amount about this.

Now after a bunch of companies want their remote workers back at the office, every one of those companies are being almost propaganda machines which do not cite sound scientific studies but cite each other and interviews with higher ups in top companies that "remote workers are less productive". This is further cementing the general public's opinion on this matter.

And research that shows the opposite is buried deep within any search results.

Have you noticed this? Please share what you have observed. I'm going paranoid about this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Key difference is that you realize that different people work differently.

My workplace is full of talking heads in upper management who constantly repeat what boils down to, "I'm more productive in the office than at home, therefore everyone must be more productive at the office than at home, therefore we need to bring everyone back."

Which is obviously horse shit.

I live alone, and working from home not only means no commute, no parking costs, comfy clothes, and all the conveniences of home...it also means having all my notes and documents at hand, not having to function from a random empty cubicle, no distraction from constant non-work-related chatter, no interruptions from coworkers walking by and deciding to talk, and when we're in crunch time, it also means I'll consider working OT to help speed things along! Working in the office means "don't even bother asking me to work OT".

I work harder, get distracted less, and somehow have better technology uptime from home, so it benefits my employer and I prefer it. All my meetings still have to be online because there's rarely ever a time where all parties are in the office at the same time.

The only reason for me to come into the office is because someone 3+ grades above me said so.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, looking for a one size fits all solution to something with so many effects on people’s daily activities is asking for trouble.

It’s great that now the wfh option exists much more substantially than a few years ago, but it sucks that so many seem to want to stuff that cat back in the bag. It seems counterintuitive if your goals are maximizing profits and talent retention. It makes me wonder how much of it is driven by the order class trying to protect real estate investments.