tweeks

joined 1 year ago
[–] tweeks@feddit.nl 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

(and motorbikes for even longer distances, and ca... wait)

[–] tweeks@feddit.nl 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Had to look it up as well, but apparently it is how you type "hoe" in a calculator upside down..

[–] tweeks@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago

Aren't there like cheat servers and non-cheat servers? Or is that a "gentleman's agreement" that not everyone is playing fair with if you can't fully block it because of mods etc?

[–] tweeks@feddit.nl 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Lunch is my favourite. Nothing beats a fine sandwich with cheese.

[–] tweeks@feddit.nl 4 points 1 month ago

text without punctuation

[–] tweeks@feddit.nl 3 points 1 month ago

Maybe the girl at the party will get jealous.

[–] tweeks@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago

Value of art is always in the eye of the beholder. If many people see the value, then it receives that from the public.

I would not say AI generated art has the same value as the Mona Lisa per se, quite the contrary. I'm only declaring both as a form of art.

[–] tweeks@feddit.nl 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Yes, in the same way a field of corn on a farm can be seen as art. We do not have full control over how it actually looks in the end, but it's an expression by natural phenomena (sometimes guided or initiated by humans).

You could argue about the amount of free will required to create art. But in that case one could philosophically raise the question if humans even have free will, and if anything may be called art then at all.

I think if something is observed as art, it is by definition art. And perhaps everything that exists and is created could fit that description. But personally one of the more interesting types of art to me are where living beings are involved in the creation, while they're actually thinking of creating art; and I think most discussions are about that concrete level.

[–] tweeks@feddit.nl 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

I'd say that open for discussion. Even taking a dump can be seen from the perspective of art, although I agree for us humans it's quite far out there.

Perhaps to smallen the gap, think of a dung beetle rolling a ball of poo.

I'm not saying you have to like it or even that it's noteworthy, but art in my opinion as definition can be anything that is created by something. As long as an observer looks at it as if it were art.

[–] tweeks@feddit.nl 15 points 2 months ago

You've convinced me, your comment is objectively bad art.

[–] tweeks@feddit.nl 10 points 2 months ago (12 children)

I'd say everything is art, just on different levels to different people. Or nothing is art.

[–] tweeks@feddit.nl -4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Don't bother, you're talking with a random idiot.

Edit: I was joking, check his name.

view more: next ›