digdilem

joined 1 year ago
[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This just makes me worried to rely on uBO but more because what if the author just fucks off because someone else pissed them off.

That is very concerning to me, also.

Large parts of the internet relying on one or two tiny one-man FOSS projects? (UBO and ADguard are often cited as the only two reliable-ish and safe adblockers)

If he can't be bothered with that nonsense, how secure is UBO's future? How secure is the future of adblocking?

I would bet that advertising companies are rubbing their hands now and planning to ramp up pressure against these poor devs.

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 days ago

I think Ubuntu made sense back in the day when Debian wasn’t as user-friendly.

This is a very good point.

When Ubuntu launched, it was a big moment for linux. Before then, setting up a linux GUI was a lot of pain (remember setting modelines for individual monitors and the endless fiddling that took - and forget about multiple monitors). Ubuntu made GUI easy - it just worked out of the box for most people. It jumped Linux forwards as a desktop a huge way and adoption grew a lot. They also physically posted you a set of CDs or a DVD for free! And they did a bunch of stuff for educational usage, and getting computers across Africa.

That was all pretty amazing at the time and all very positive.

But then everyone else caught up with the usability and they turned into a corporate entity. Somewhere along the way they stopped listening to their users, or at least the users felt they had no voice, and a lot more linux distros appeared.

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

As you say, lots of spicy food options. Our National Dish is actually a curry - chicken masala and Phall, the hottest curry, was invented in Birmingham.

Also - in the picture are baked beans. They're invented in the USA. We adopted them, but they're not ours.

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What's really insane is that sometimes the second identical test actually works.

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

I used to write to DVD's, but the failure rate was astronomical - like 50% after 5 years, some with physical separation of the silvering. Plus today they're so relatively small they're not worth using.

I've gone through many iterations and currently my home setup is this:

  • I have several systems that make daily backups from various computers and save them onto a hard drive inside one of my servers.
  • That server has an external hard drive attached to it controlled by a wifi plug controlled by home assistant.
  • Once a month, a scheduled task wakes up that external hdd and copies the contents of the online backup directory onto it. It then turns it off again and emails me "Oi, minion. Backups complete, swap them out". That takes five minutes.
  • Then I take the usb disk and put it in my safe, removing the oldest of 3 (the classic, grandfather, father, son rotation) from there and putting that back on the server for next time.
  • Once a year, I turn the oldest HDD into an "Annual backup", replacing it with a new one. That stops the disks expiring from old age at the same time, and annual backups aren't usually that valuable.

Having the hdd's in the safe means that total failure/ransomware takes, at most, a month's worth. I can survive that. The safe is also fireproof and in another building to the server.

This sort of thing doesn't need to be high capacity HDDs either - USB drives and micro-SD cards are very capable now. If you're limited on physical space and don't mind slower write times (which when automating is generally ok), the microSd's and clear labelling is just as good. You're not going to kill them through excessive writes for decades.

I also have a bunch of other stuff that is not critical - media files, music. None of that is unique and can be replaced. All of that is backed to a secondary "live" directory on the same pc - mostly in case of my incompetence in deleting something I actually wanted. But none of that is essential - I think it's important to be clear about what you "must save" and what is "nice to save"

The clear thing is to sit back and work out a system that is right for you. And it always, ALWAYS should be as automated as you can make it - humans are lazy sods and easily justify not doing stuff. Computers are great and remembering to do repetitive tasks, so use that.

Include checks to ensure the backed up data is both what you expected it to be, and recoverable - so include a calendar reminder to actually /read/ from a backup drive once or twice a year.

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago

It even has the approval of my wife.

He is the chosen one! Hail him!

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Strange. That seems to go against the Home Office's own Code of Practice

"13 3.2.2 Any proposed deployment that includes audio recording in a public place is likely to require a strong justification of necessity to establish its proportionality. There is a strong presumption that a surveillance camera system must not be used to record conversations as this is highly intrusive and unlikely to be justified"

I hope they've taken good legal advice.

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 weeks ago

Never say never - unless you're writing clickbait.

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 44 points 3 weeks ago

"Justice delayed is justice denied"

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago

Anarchism is all about working together to build a better world where everyone has all of their needs met,

Hmm, I was working with the classic disctionary definition which is "a state of disorder due to absence or non-recognition of authority or other controlling systems."

But you're right, anarchism does have that other meaning, so perhaps a better word would be "chaos".

His actions in supporting Trump in the US, promoting hate and extermist views on X globally, and encouraging civil war in the UK do all fit a chaos agenda. That's not about money - at least, not that I can see.

He is one of the world's most dangerous people, however, and I don't say that lightly. Not least because of his history of being unpredictable.

More governments should follow Brazil's example and push back.

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

He has more than anyone else in the history of the world. By any scale, he's won at money.

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago

That's been said, and perhaps it has been true. But when you're the richest man in the world by a significant margin, you have literally won at money and to remain competitive you need to move onto other things. Like the power of politics, and working to destabilise multiple countries at once.

view more: next ›