damon

joined 11 months ago
[–] damon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Nos.social is one, there is https://github.com/atrifat/nostr-filter-relay amongst other tools integrated into some relays.

You said that like that’s been reality, I’m not going based on simply what’s possible but what’s happened when instances suddenly shutdown

If the same came be achieved why hasn’t it been? It is a matter of individualism. People often see instances as communities, I don’t agree with this assessment with the exception of coop and special interest instances.

[–] damon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But you weren’t discussing Twitter you were discussing Bluesky. They built it with decentralised identities so that users owned their identities and can move about freely. You saying people could “easily” move to another instance isn’t reality. People already find the Fediverse too difficult, as you and I discussed under a different thread people actually care about their data which also includes their posting history. Humans by nature do not like change. People complain about Mastodon.social being too big to block. So, if people that want to block mastodon.social due to what they believe is poor content moderation but feel they can’t because of its size how likely that people would find it “easy” to move to another instance ?

[–] damon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Same thing if some Billionaire purchased Mastodon.social & Mastodon.online. You’d have most of the fedi under their control

[–] damon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That’s not true it’s not entirely punted to the end user. It starts with the relay operators just like it does instances. All of the same moderation tools that users have on instances and with clients Nostr users have too, so I’m not really sure about that comment. Also, maybe it’s because I’m a US citizen but I don’t get what so problematic about individualism and allowing users the ability to drive their own experiences. You mention the keys that’s still under user control as if instances have not gone down with users identities, content and social graphs Usability worse than anything on AP that’s very broad. Go point for point with comparisons You can filter out any content related to Bitcoin.

[–] damon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)
 

Just wondering if you guys and the mods think it would be a good idea to have a thread for free agency moves and discussion?

[–] damon@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Sheesh that is insane, I am curious how long it would take to remake X

[–] damon@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Who said one instance? It’s a pod store by a pod provider, which there will be multiple pod providers. Please go research Solid. Even in the scenario of multiple accounts in multiple instances you don’t own nor control your data. With Solid you get to determine what access and how much access a provider & service has

[–] damon@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It is Foss. Where is it mentioning monopolising the Fediverse? Having instances is a form of centralisation. People should not have to self host to not be tethered to an instance. Like how does what you said even make sense compared to the realities of right now?

58
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by damon@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/10462412 Q&A on ActivityPods and Its Integration with Memory for the Lemmy Community**

Q1: What is ActivityPods and How Does It Relate to Memory?

A1: ActivityPods is a framework that combines ActivityPub, a decentralised social networking protocol, with Solid Pods, personal online data stores. It allows for unified data management and control across various platforms. Memory, built upon ActivityPods, leverages this framework to offer users a more integrated, secure, and user-controlled experience.

Q2: I'm New to the Fediverse. How Does ActivityPods Enhance My Experience?

A2: For newcomers, ActivityPods offers a simplified yet powerful way to engage with the Fediverse. Instead of managing multiple accounts on different platforms (like Mastodon, Pixelfed), you have one centralised profile and data store (Pod). This means easier management of your digital identity and activities across various platforms.

Q3: I'm a Current Fedizen. Why Should I Consider Using Memory?

A3: As an existing Fediverse user, you'll appreciate the enhanced data control and portability that Memory offers. Your data is stored in your own Pod, giving you full control over it. Plus, you can interact with different Fediverse platforms using a single account, streamlining your social media experience.

Q4: For Fediverse Admins/Mods, What Are the Benefits of ActivityPods?

A4: Admins and moderators will find that ActivityPods simplifies user management and enhances security. Since users control their own data in Pods, there's less burden on the platform for data storage and protection. It also opens up new possibilities for cross-platform moderation and community engagement.

Q5: As a Fediverse Developer, How Can I Utilise ActivityPods in My Projects?

A5: Developers can harness ActivityPods to create more user-centric and interoperable applications. It supports semantic web standards for data, ensuring compatibility across different platforms. This means you can develop apps that seamlessly integrate with various parts of the Fediverse, enhancing the overall ecosystem.

Q6: Will My Username and Identity Be Consistent Across Platforms with ActivityPods?

A6: Yes, ActivityPods aims to provide a consistent username and identity across different platforms. While the specifics can vary based on implementation, the general idea is to have a unified digital presence in the Fediverse, making your interactions more cohesive.

Q7: How Does ActivityPods Ensure My Data Privacy and Security?

A7: Your data is stored in Solid Pods, which you have full control over. You can set permissions for who accesses your data and how it's used. This decentralised approach to data storage means enhanced privacy and security, as your information isn't held in a central server controlled by a single entity.

Q8: Can I Move My Existing Fediverse Data to Memory?

A8: The portability feature of ActivityPods should, in theory, allow you to move your existing data to Memory. However, this process might depend on the specific platforms you're currently using and their compatibility with ActivityPods.

Q9: Is Memory with ActivityPods Suitable for Non-Technical Users?

A9: Absolutely! One of the goals of Memory built on ActivityPods is to make decentralised social networking accessible and user-friendly. Even if you're not technically inclined, you can enjoy a streamlined and secure social media experience.

Q10: How Can I Get Started with Memory and ActivityPods?

A10: Getting started is as simple as signing up for a Memory account. From there, you'll be guided through setting up your Pod and connecting with various platforms in the Fediverse. The process is designed to be intuitive and user-friendly.

ActivityPods Repo

[–] damon@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Your response on ActivityPods and Solid – pretty spot on! I will toss in a couple more nuggets. Solid's kinda like having your own Google Drive, but you call the shots on who peeks into your stuff. It's all about files and folders. Sure, Solid uses RDF for the geeky metadata part, but at its heart, it's all about files. With ActivityPods, Instead of just playing with files, it uses something called an RDF Triple Store. Think of it as a smart way to store data that's all about connections and relationships. This means ActivityPods is more about mapping out how data is connected, like a big web of info, rather than just storing files. Super handy for social apps where who knows who, and who does what matters a lot. Like Solid, ActivityPods is big on you owning your data. But it's not just sitting in a digital drawer. It's active, social, and part of a bigger community. The author of ActivityPods has a very similar view of the social web compared to Evan P.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/10629691

Update to ActivityPods released before the anticipated 2.0 in the Spring. Please check the link to the blogpost as it goes into detail. It primarily covers simplified invitation links and contact groups.

[–] damon@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Finally started playing FFVII Crisis Core Reunion

[–] damon@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

No, I'm talking about making extensions to the protocol that becomes the defacto standard

[–] damon@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

They don’t have to take energy to adopt the format. You do realise that current ActivityPub services don’t support all services and features of the other platforms? You realise a great deal of Fediverse utilises Mastodon’s implementation of AP? So a lot of what people are worried about Threads doing has already been done by Mastodon.

view more: next ›