Soul_Greatsword

Describing genocide makes me feel emotions. I'd rather they just pretend it's not happening like the good western countries.

There's been enough members of the Israeli state that have expressed a very clear intent.

But yeah, The Hill seems to be implying that the massive civilian casualties are ok because "it's not genocide".

Even the ones that aren't blatant leftists represent a break of the status quo. Big budget heroes always want to keep things as they are and are never fighting for positive change.

Kinda. That shape gets used by a bunch of armed forces. The arms of the German iron cross are kinda pinched in the middle.

Maybe I'm unfamiliar with the distribution of emergency aid, but never in my life have I seen goods so vaguely labelled. It appears they've slapped that label on every side and made no attempt to catalogue what might be inside

One of my favourite Maos. It gives you that a good thermometer for how effective an anti-capitalist movement is. Just check how much capitalist feathers are being ruffled.

On the other hand the amount of indoctrination and propoganda they show to have absorbed couldn't be achieved in a couple of decades on this planet.

I suspect many .world types are as old as I am and have gone all in on defender of the empire.

Might have been a racist spirit.

Agreed. As socialists we often struggle to educate other members of the working class on how a change in their political outlook would benefit them. Trying to change their cultural, religious, or philosophical views is not only arrogant but has also often been historically been disastrous.

Nah, just vote a bit harder.

Who knows? Another hundred years and another minority might get rights.

Pretty much any post more than a few hours old on lemmygrad has a lone downvote on it. Either it's a committed lib or they made a bot. Either way it's a good example of liberal praxis.

Prime minister and Supreme leader are literally synonyms yet have such wildly different implications.