Routhinator

joined 2 years ago
[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 4 points 2 weeks ago

The problem I see with this is that a Meta employee literally came out on Mastodon recently and revealed that non of these settings do anything and are false flags.

https://misskey.de/notes/a3ax4tqomg

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Never mind, youtube faked me out. Looks like the new one will require a proxy

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I keep reading this as Marijuana chip.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is the one I was looking for. So famous its been used in numerous games.

AKA the Konami Code

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konami_Code

Worked in most of the TMNT games too.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Might be Brodie's?

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago

In Plasma 6 there are a crazy number of ways to skin and change the look.

This video was a good way for me to learn some of the basics. https://youtu.be/R6C-RNhHMrE

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 15 points 2 months ago

KDEs vision is letting users have the experience they want. You can have a vision without limiting configurability and cramming bad UX down the pipe to your users.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 27 points 2 months ago (9 children)

I used Gnome Shell 3 for 4 years before giving up on it and going to KDE.

The huge differentiator is that KDE may look like windows OOTB on most distros, but if you want you can easily make it look like Gnome, Mac, Unity.. whatever. The panels and menus are infinitely configurable.

And that is why this meme is dead on the money. I've come to hate dev teams that have "visions" that they cram down users throats regardless of the experience. And the irony is that Gnome 2 used to be much more configurable than older KDE versions.

 

So much food.

 

Title says it all. He sells Scrooge better than any other movie adaptation I've seen.

 

As the title says, I'm curious if they ever named or revisited this Human civilization in the later parts of the timeline in any way? It seems like too good of an opportunity to not revisit it at some point.

My searches did not reveal any answer, so thought I'd ask my fellow trek nerds.

-43
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by Routhinator@startrek.website to c/politics@lemmy.world
 

This is the most unfiltered article I've read from The Atlantic... by the time I finished the second paragraph I had to re-read the title to understand how I got here.

Edit: To be clear, this has been revealed as satire, its just so close to reality one could be forgiven for confusing the two.

 

Just had this one shared with me directly on signal and could not find it in here, nor could I find a source. Too good not to share though. If someone knows the meme creator I'll update this with proper credit.

 

Riker came down on a whole other deck and wants answers.

 

Is the darkspace theme something that comes packaged with Lemmy or something the server admins are throwing together? I love where it's going but its in need of some love.. there's nothing to make the posts readable against the background.

Complaints are not intended here, I could likely help if someone points me to a place where I can make PRs.

view more: next ›