RedReaper

joined 1 year ago
[โ€“] RedReaper@infosec.pub 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Company I work at does HP warranty repairs on hehalf of HP and the number of fuckin shattered screens from the shitty plastic hinge screw housing being shorn off was absurd.

It seems to be the case with a lot of the bezel-less designs, since I know I've seen some other brands with the same problem.

I just hate that they seem to have decided it's more profitable to just leave the shitty design as-is and deal with the repairs than to actually design that shit better.

$200 definitely seems reasonable though on part cost alone, since HUs are typically the 2nd most expensive order able part besides the system board itself.

[โ€“] RedReaper@infosec.pub 2 points 11 months ago

In other words, the 3 parties acting as they always do๐Ÿ˜

[โ€“] RedReaper@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

333C would seem to indicate that you are correct, however as it pertains to me making a living, it's not something I'm entirely willing to test out, even if losing my minimum salary job wouldn't exactly be the end of the world.

In any case, the fact that it was legal up until less than a year ago is egregious.

[โ€“] RedReaper@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Indeed I am, however that quote was taken from Fairwork (https://www.fairwork.gov.au/pay-and-wages/pay-secrecy), which is hope is correct considering it's the main government sure for these sorts of things ahahaha. It's under the "When these rights apply" section.

I also variety remember looking at the legislature itself at the time and coming to the same conclusion.

[โ€“] RedReaper@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Don't get me wrong, I still do it anyway. However I can't do so as openly as I'd like other use they can and will cause a stink about it (as they've done in the past when I wasn't careful enough with who I discussed it with)

Where a contract entered into before 7 December 2022 has pay secrecy terms that are inconsistent with these rights, and the contract is changed after 7 December 2022, these rights apply after the contract is changed.

[โ€“] RedReaper@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Sadly, my contract prohibits discussing pay since it was written before the law that disallowed employers from including such clauses was a thing. Stuck with it until they have to alter my contract for any reason.

[โ€“] RedReaper@infosec.pub 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"New Sexuality" and the first order of business was to create a bespoke slur for it?

[โ€“] RedReaper@infosec.pub 7 points 1 year ago

Got any sources for that? Since I can't seem to find anything that supports that claim outside of religious texts

[โ€“] RedReaper@infosec.pub 15 points 1 year ago

Something tells me that the Torah isn't exactly a reliable historical source.

The Cannanite - Israelite connection is suggested by modern achaelogical information which I take as a little more reliable.

[โ€“] RedReaper@infosec.pub 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Of which the Israelites are believed to have branched out from/are descended from

[โ€“] RedReaper@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You probably would be too if someone mummified you

[โ€“] RedReaper@infosec.pub 11 points 1 year ago

Looks like a good ole' ute

view more: next โ€บ