Rageagainstbelief

joined 1 year ago

I deactivated my accounts just the other day. I haven’t been active for years so it was an easy decision. I could see why if you have a ton of followers it would be harder to do.

[–] Rageagainstbelief@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I’ve been ducking for years never say that though. I use search or looked up.

[–] Rageagainstbelief@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

JD Vance has offered to change Trump’s diapers as penance for his transgressions.

Why is my mouth watering?

[–] Rageagainstbelief@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Probably my favorite game maybe because of some similarities with the main character I loved the redemption arc. I loved the capitalist socialist critiques. I wish more games would focus on that dichotomy.

[–] Rageagainstbelief@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Unfortunately the kkk as well

[–] Rageagainstbelief@lemmy.world 189 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Execs and the late stage capitalism game they play is ruining everything.

[–] Rageagainstbelief@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If they would make them backwards compatible I would be more likely to upgrade it still bugs me that they stopped doing that. I miss my old PS3. That thing was awesome I even installed Linux on it and had emulators working… the good old days.

[–] Rageagainstbelief@lemmy.world 82 points 5 months ago (12 children)

I feel like this is a game of find all the AI mistakes. Like how long are Susan’s legs!!

[–] Rageagainstbelief@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I didn’t mean to throw your argument back at you. I agree with it. I just read it and thought you could describe humans with it as well albeit not that completely or charitably. I think by no means should we allow LLMs to make decisions. They could help us be more objective maybe in some cases by educating us. But yeah handing over agency to an AI is a frightening concept.

And no of course wiping out civilization is not a solution. I can get pessimistic about our ability to avoid destroying ourselves with or without the help of AI. I still think world peace is largely unattainable. At least without some draconian controls in place and a whole lot of time and education. I could change my mind on that. I hope we’ll get there someday.

[–] Rageagainstbelief@lemmy.world -5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Why the actual fuck is anyone considering putting humans into the driving seat of anything?!

Of course they make fucked up decisions with no proper or justifiable rationale, because they have no brains. They're language models, stochastic parrots stringing together sentences to fit the prompt(s) given to them.

Sorry I didn’t mean for that to be snarky. My point in doing that was to say individual humans aren’t much better. That’s why it’s important not to place too much power or even agency on one person.

A language model has in its head, wrong word, what only multitudes could contain and maybe it’s detecting, another wrong word, a pattern with human civilization through our history and interactions. And if it’s goal is to achieve peace what other solution is there? I don’t believe in a world without conflict. I wish I could.

[–] Rageagainstbelief@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I tend to agree with the author. He’s not saying we can’t make choices. We do have the ability to make choices. It’s just that our choices are driven by so much history and memories and brain capability/functioning. Outside stimuli is so important. The sage advice from a relative is important. That’s why if you want to fly like an eagle don’t hang out with the turkeys.

view more: next ›