Orcocracy

joined 3 years ago
[–] Orcocracy@hexbear.net 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Yes, EU policy is clear. Foreign companies deliberately undercutting European business to monopolize whole sectors is only ok if they’re American, not Chinese. Amazon good, BYD bad.

[–] Orcocracy@hexbear.net 35 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Fahrenheit is what Americans feel, Celsius is what everyone else feels, and Kelvin is just Celsius +273.

[–] Orcocracy@hexbear.net 1 points 2 months ago

AI, algorithms, and the statistics that power them are not that smart. They have no way of knowing for sure what is in your head when you hit the delete button.

[–] Orcocracy@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago

Yes, the drone pilots double-tapping weddings sure are heroes.

[–] Orcocracy@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Hang on, how did a US soldier give Donald Trump the freedom to say stupid shit? Who was going to take that freedom away, and perhaps the most bizarre part of all: why did the soldier stop them from taking that freedom away?

[–] Orcocracy@hexbear.net 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Is having lots more green energy not a result?

[–] Orcocracy@hexbear.net 10 points 10 months ago

Ok, explain how it is true that every human purely by being born is equally culpable, and that human society isn’t at issue? And then you can explain why this doesn’t apply to you and your family.

[–] Orcocracy@hexbear.net 20 points 10 months ago (9 children)

It is absolutely not a fact. There is nothing inherent about any human being that causes damage to the environment. It’s what human society as we organize it does, and a very small number of people do an incredibly outsized proportion of the damage. Focusing on things like birth control and overpopulation is a major part of ecofascist rhetoric. It is also very much about punishing a distant other because after all, if you really believed that all human births were inherently damaging to the environment, we wouldn’t be having this conversation as you would have already undone the damage caused by your own parents. But you haven’t, and nor should you for many good reasons! Those reasons also apply to everyone else too.

[–] Orcocracy@hexbear.net 28 points 10 months ago (11 children)

That’s ecofascism.

[–] Orcocracy@hexbear.net 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Same with the mayor of Vancouver, some city councillors, some MPs, etc. It was a full on racist witch-hunt that only seemed to simmer down once some spies from India shot a guy and broke the narrative.

[–] Orcocracy@hexbear.net 37 points 10 months ago (9 children)

Yay, happy hail Satan day everyone. I remember when Intel chickened out and rounded up their 666 megahertz pentium 3 processors to report as being 667 megahertz. Absolute cowards, no wonder China is kicking their ass.

[–] Orcocracy@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Perhaps. Or perhaps what uses more over a lifetime is an ebook that is bounced around from device to device which all turn to toxic e-waste after a few years, constantly communicating with always-on servers for account data and DRM authentication hosted in a data centre based in a region powered by fossil fuels. All while a paper book just sits on a shelf causing no further environmental impact - potentially for hundreds of years.

To be fair, nobody’s preference for paper books or ebooks will change the environment in any meaningful way - the problems are much more systemic and require radical action from an unwilling corporate and political elite that has been ignoring the problem for decades.

view more: next ›