Glytch

joined 8 months ago
[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

This was exactly my first thought. Not surprised that the pioneers of shitty dlc made shitty dlc.

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

As Catherine Ryan put it: "She's just an innocent gold digger who got in way over her head".

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

You're thinking of a trilobite

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

It rhymes with Taylor Swift's nickname

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

So exactly what was said about Biden in 2020. Except once Biden was elected that pressure evaporated as liberals lost interest in progressive policies.

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (6 children)
[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Legend. The Elf Slayer. Pelinal Whitestrake

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Hence "mission accomplished"

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A lie of omission is still a lie.

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

That would need to be a wide ranging study with a very large sample size, just to be sure we get the most robust dataset we can. Better to use all of them than just a small sample.

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Apologies, but I was reading them in person so I don't have links to them. Maybe try on the website for the secretary of state in Nevada?

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Having read the forms necessary to get a candidate or initiative on the ballot, I can tell you they are not hard to tell apart if you actually read them. A campaign that is serious about their stated goals would do the basic work of reading the form.

view more: next ›