AES

joined 1 year ago
[–] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 2 points 1 year ago

I am using an Intel NUC with 32gig ram. Super efficient.

[–] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 1 points 1 year ago

Man... Perez. RB would be struggling to win the WDC and WCC with 2 of them.

[–] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 2 points 1 year ago

This is the way.

[–] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 2 points 1 year ago

A fake taxi like they say.

[–] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

But few can be relocked.

[–] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 2 points 1 year ago

If you are on Android I recommend NZB360 as companion app. It's freaking awesome.

[–] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 3 points 1 year ago

Wow, thanks for that.

[–] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes ofc they can. The Wireguard protocol is not designed to be hidden.

Interesting read: https://www.ntkernel.com/how-to-bypass-egypts-wireguard-ban/

423
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu to c/reddit@lemmy.world
 

Lemmy: "that is a fair point"

Reddit: "you fucking moron"

13
Hide Lemmy UI behind VPN? (lemmy.ronsmans.eu)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
 

I have set up a small Lemmy instance (Docker + NPM) for testing purposes, and I was wondering if it is possible to only expose the activitypub to the internet and hide the Lemmy UI behind my personal wireguard VPN. So the UI is only accessible on the local LAN.

view more: next ›