AES

joined 2 years ago
[–] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 2 points 2 years ago

I am using an Intel NUC with 32gig ram. Super efficient.

[–] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 1 points 2 years ago

Man... Perez. RB would be struggling to win the WDC and WCC with 2 of them.

[–] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 2 points 2 years ago

This is the way.

[–] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 2 points 2 years ago

A fake taxi like they say.

[–] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

But few can be relocked.

[–] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 2 points 2 years ago

If you are on Android I recommend NZB360 as companion app. It's freaking awesome.

[–] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 3 points 2 years ago

Wow, thanks for that.

[–] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 2 points 2 years ago
[–] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes ofc they can. The Wireguard protocol is not designed to be hidden.

Interesting read: https://www.ntkernel.com/how-to-bypass-egypts-wireguard-ban/

423
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu to c/reddit@lemmy.world
 

Lemmy: "that is a fair point"

Reddit: "you fucking moron"

13
Hide Lemmy UI behind VPN? (lemmy.ronsmans.eu)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
 

I have set up a small Lemmy instance (Docker + NPM) for testing purposes, and I was wondering if it is possible to only expose the activitypub to the internet and hide the Lemmy UI behind my personal wireguard VPN. So the UI is only accessible on the local LAN.

view more: next ›