this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
56 points (93.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26682 readers
3202 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics.


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Griseowulfin@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ones_Who_Walk_Away_from_Omelas

Basically the plot of this story. It poses the issue of how much we value society over the individual, and if that is good or not. Would you want to live in a world that depended on the the torture of a single person. You then could extrapolate that out to societies in the real world, US and chattel slavery. the west and the use of sweat shop labor for cheap products, the Emirates and their use of migrants as indentured servants. Even tipped wages for servers in the USA, the gig economy, and things like medical residencies could be considered a minor version of Omelas. As humans, we often tolerate the abuse or exploitation of others for our own benefit, or even just out of ignorance and inaction.

It is a quick read. One of a handful of stories that I have gone back to over the decades.

[–] AsimovsRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A great story that illustrates this question really well. It is by Ursula K. Le Guin, written in 1973, if anyone is wondering.

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ursula K. Le Guin

So pissed that she is not much more famous. Earthsea is one of the great fantasy stories that people tend to forget.

[–] AsimovsRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It always strikes me how few female sci-fi and fantasy writers I've read. I've tried amending that mistake over the last couple of years but it's not easy, especially when looking for books translated into more obscure languages.

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now that you say it - her sci-fi is also up there with the best. Did you find any other interesting female sci-fi authors?

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Julian May has a great series in two parts, the Saga of Pliocene exiles and the Galactic Milieu trilogy. Amazing books, great story, very moving and thought provoking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SeahorseTreble@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Like what happens in the anthropocene to pretty much all animals except dogs & cats lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] willy_wallace@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, most Christians would say yes because that's the entire premise of the crucifixion.

[–] Thoven@lemdro.id 12 points 1 year ago

This interpretation leaves out the most important part of the crucifixion story: Jesus willingly took on the world's sins out of love. So whether or not most Christians would say yes depends on if the one person being tortured has a choice in the matter, which is unspecified in the question.

[–] Terevos@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I came to say the same thing. This is exactly what Christianity believes.

But of course, it was Jesus who gave himself willingly.

If he was forced to do that, it would've been reprehensible because he was the only truly innocent person who ever lived.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'll take a different approach here. Evolution does not care about your feelings.

If a species is unwilling to self-sacrifice for the greater good, and it comes up against an event that cannot be solved with selfishness, it goes extinct. Like in this scenario.

But evolution is a motherfucker, and evolution does not care about your feelings, the only thing that matters to evolution is reproductive success. So some people are going to be altruistic because that's better for the species because it makes it more survivable.

I'm not saying it's right, I'm not saying it's wrong, but the species that's going to survive is the one that's willing to self sacrifice for the greater good of the species. To increase reproductive success. And that's what's going to be left in the universe. Because evolution does not care. You either get with the program or you get out of the gene pool no other option

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Evolution is not a good base for morals. We tried it out - was really bad.

[–] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Now hold on. How can we be certain? Maybe holocaust 2: electric boogaloo will be better

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm in Germany, so not sure if allowed to answer.

[–] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure you can! Say it with me: "Eugenics and genocide aren't a fast track to an improved gene pool. Holocaust 2 is bad news bears."

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Dang, I'm already marching on the street with a burning torch.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] potterpockets@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you mean ultimate badass Talenel’Elin , Herald of War?

[–] Kaladin_Stormblessed@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] potterpockets@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Username checks out. Lol.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No it’s not morally preferable. Fuck that world that requires human sacrifice.

[–] SeahorseTreble@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Just out of interest, what if we make it a (not-human) animal instead of a human? Or, what if we make it trillions of animals every year. What about a world that doesn't require it but still includes mass amounts of animal sacrifice unnecessarily? That's the world we're in right now 😂

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I mean the "first world" is built entirely on the sacrifices of the rest of the world. People live in unimaginably horrible conditions so that we can consume and be free.

[–] lath@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An inherently flawed world maintaining its function through cannibalism will inevitably devour itself into nonexistence. Why prolong its suffering?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pandaconurbano@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd just walk away from Omelas.

[–] AsimovsRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

A great story that illustrates this question really well. It is by Ursula K. Le Guin, written in 1973, if anyone is wondering.

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

I think it has happened numerous times already under the same pretense.

I am not sure if we are saved or not.

[–] DeanFogg@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is that person Rupert Murdoch? Then yes

[–] LetterboxPancake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Haha, innocent. He doesn't really fit the description.

[–] DeanFogg@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DoomBot5@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Can we torture 10 deserving people instead of 1 innocent?

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

I would not do it, if somebody else does it - so be it.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Unfair to ask the question in the incomplete form.. The tortured person is you. Now answer

[–] danileonis@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Someone needs to watch "Knock at the Cabin" by Shyamalan.

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] danileonis@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Absolutely!

[–] karmiclychee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

"healthy unemployment rate"

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Nope. That's a world that's not worth saving.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Come torture me

[–] Blackdoomax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] DrCatface@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›