this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
43 points (75.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26426 readers
1974 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It's excruciatingly obnoxious to have to rely on third party sources for what should be a first-party feature.

Like, I select all and then search a query. "Oh no, nobody on your server used a third party service to find it, so you won't see it here."

Like, how short-sighted is that, really? If I search for a string in the 'all' servers, I should have a list of 'all' the servers containing that string.

It's a really simple concept. Not sure why this post even has to be made, but I'm wondering if there's something I can do to make these 'features' more intuitive.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

What does 'All' mean to you?

In this context it means all posts which are stored on the server you are on. And only things are stored which people subscribed to. It does not mean "‘all’ servers".

There are good reasons why the protocol has been designed like that, if you're interested then you can find out about it. If not, reddit still exists for people who like it more.

[–] randomaccount43543@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So All does not show posts from all instances federated with your instance, but only posts from all communities subscribed to by people in your instance?

[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 4 points 1 year ago

Correct.

Source: On my one person instance All = Subscribed

[–] krayj@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

The word "all" fundamentally means everything? By calling it "all" they are really doing a disservice to everyone who, gasp, assumes "all" means "all" when it really means "local communities and local user foreign subscriptions". I don't know what they should call it, but redefining the words "all" to be "not all" is super confusing, especially for users new to lemmy.

[–] Spuddlesv2@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All means all. If it isn’t actually All (it isn’t) then it should be called something else.

[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 15 points 1 year ago (7 children)

But it is all, just not the all you think, it's all things the server is aware of, not all things in the universe.

[–] Zetaphor@zemmy.cc 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

This is not obvious to anyone who doesn't have some understanding of how networking and federation work, which is most people. Especially if we're talking about users who have only ever experienced centralized platforms.

It should be called "Known Network" or something more transparent that doesn't require an explanation of indexing

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bobman@unilem.org 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

'All' to me means """all""" the servers my instance can connect to that contain that string.

It's a very simple concept.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Resource wise, it makes sense to only retrieve content the users of the instance are interested in. Think about all the nsfw communities popping on lemmynsfw and pornlemmy, as well as all the content in languages your users don't speak.

Some instances are multilingual, so you don't want to defederate from them (and defederation shouldn't really be used in this context anyway), but retrieving 50% of content none of your users is ever going to read seems like a waste.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Destragras@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Pleroma calls their equivalent of "All" the "Known Network" instead, which does a better job explaining what will show up there in my opinion.

[–] PupBiru@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (8 children)

totally understand the frustration, and i’m not going to try and invalidate it!

… however, it’s definitely not a problem with a simple solution

since anyone can start an instance, when you search “all”, where should it search? i don’t mean generally like “all the instances”, i mean where specifically? things like lemmy.world, lemmy.ml, kbin.social, etc are obvious… but what about lemmy.mydomainforfriends.social (not real but let’s pretend someone created their own little instance for friends there!)?

let’s say you say yes that should be searched, okay… how does your instance know it’s there? does it tell all other instances that it exists at some point? where does IT get that list from? (the current solution to this is that your instance starts to “know about” an instance after someone interacts with it, but this has the problem you’ve described)

let’s say that instance shouldn’t be searched… now, what are the rules (automatic id assume; not with human intervention) that would allow an instance to be added to some big list somewhere? also where is that list? now we’re back at problem 1: how do you store a federated list of servers?

the problem gets even harder when you consider mastodon, pixelfed, peertube, etc… all these services interact: should all include them? only certain things in them?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] krayj@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's a massive usability issue and a massive content discovery issue, imo.

For lemmy users who got lucky and had their first lemmy experience on a top 5 instance where a lot of popular off-instance communities are already subscribed to, then users would see a huge list of both local and foreign communities. For users who got unlucky and had their first lemmy experience on a small instance, their view of "all" looks like a ghost town.

Part of the problem is semantical. If they are going to call it "all" then it should really be all (all lemmy communities available on all federated instances). If it isn't going to actually show everything, then they should call it something else that indicates it's only local communities plus whatever local users are subscribed to.

[–] Zalack@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like the idea of calling it "Known Network" and "Local"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What prevents users from switching to a top 10 instance using https://github.com/CMahaff/lasim or other migration tools?

Resource wise, it makes sense to only retrieve content the users of the instance are interested in. Think about all the nsfw communities popping on lemmynsfw and pornlemmy, as well as all the content in languages your users don't speak.

[–] krayj@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are obviously speaking from the privilege of someone not only familiar with how lemmy works, and who understands the difference and pros/cons of joining a large vs small instance and can probably even name a bunch, but also someone who knows of obscure tools and github repos that host those tools. What prevents users from switching using that obscure tool you referenced is that most users never heard of it and didn't know it even existed. You are using the argument that new and casual users should have god-level knowledge and understanding...which is exactly the point I'm trying to argue against. Casual and new users don't know what they don't know. They don't know what other communities are out there and they don't know that when they view "all" that they aren't seeing them. Think about this from the perspective of someone who doesn't know what you know.

Regarding your argument about NSFW and foreign language search results....that already happens now when users of your instance have subscribed to those things. You can't argue that it would become a problem when it's already happening right now. If it really was the problem that you think it is, then the solution would be to mimic what every other search tool figured out three decades ago and put an option to exclude nsfw results when viewing/searching "all" communities. It's already possible for communities to flag themselves as NSFW, and it's already possible for communities to designate their community language setting, it would make sense that those options be presented to users for filtering. These filtering options are things we need now regardless of whether search results come from actual-all or subset-all. I'm just suggesting that "all" mean "actual all".

But, just for fun, let's steelman your claim that it would be technologically infeasible for "all" to be "all fediverse" as opposed to a subset of just what this server's users subscribe to (it's absolutely not technologically infeasible, but lets pretend it is) - even it that scenario, they should at least change up the UI for the communities page to make it clear that when the user selects "all" that they aren't really getting all - it should be made clear what the user is actually getting, which is "local, plus foreign content that is subscribed to locally". It simply is not truly "all", so presenting it as "all" is only leading to more confusion about what the users are seeing.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Casual and new users don’t know what they don’t know. They don’t know what other communities are out there and they don’t know that when they view “all” that they aren’t seeing them. Think about this from the perspective of someone who doesn’t know what you know.

Then they can ask. Plenty of new joiners ask plenty of other questions, and the community has answered them. I agree there should probably be a consolidated wiki at a later point to address this kind of questions, but with the constant evolution of the platform, and the animation of the different communities, I guess everyone is just busy with something else.

I'm not going to address the rest of your comments as this is a decision made on the Lemmy platform level, actually I just had a look at the GitHub issues, and this issue is already tracked here: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/2951

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just bringing this to everyone's awareness, the issues is already tracked here: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/2951

From the Lemmy devs

I think the lemmy-ui's could very much benefit from a "global community discovery service" like https://browse.feddit.de , but integrated into the front ends. I'd of course prefer that each lemmy back-end do their own crawling of communities and instances, to make it as distributed as possible.

[–] bobman@unilem.org 2 points 1 year ago

Thank you for sharing this!

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Someone will implement it.

The protocol itself is decentralized. Which is good.

If a app wants to use a central service to search thats a option available to them.

[–] Oisteink@feddit.nl 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Userbase don’t care about how the tech works under the hood - user base sees no content and goes back to Reddit.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The original poster asked why.

I was answering why

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they can't bother with investigating the platform for 10 minutes, I think they should stay on Reddit and keep complaining about the awful app and website over there.

[–] Oisteink@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Winning tactic. I’d like to stay a place with people with knowledge and interesting viewpoint, regardless of their ability to find search services on other websites to locate content.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] bobman@unilem.org 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Thanks for the heads up.

I'm not exactly sure what features are up to the admins and which are standard. If there's a server that implements this and mine doesn't, I can definitely see myself switching.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kilgore@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

Omg I didn't know this! Though I did wonder why my "all" feed seemed to empty.

[–] moobythegoldensock@geddit.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The simple explanation is your instance doesn’t “know” what’s out there. lemmy.world doesn’t know when lemmy.ml adds a community, and it doesn’t know when hypothetical.server pops up as a new instance. There’s not really a good way of knowing that without having a central repository, which defeats the purpose of a centralized platform.

One thing you can do is use Lemmy Explorer to search for communities on other instances and subscribe to them. This will fill up All for everyone on your instance.

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Looks to me like lemmy explorer could just be sourced for results fairly easy. Even if it was just added as an additional source to the default listings. Similar to setting up yum repos etcetera. Is there a good reason this isn’t a thing? I know my use and exposure to communities is severely limited by the current cluster fuck of finding communities. I just don’t care enough to go further than searching in the app and closing out if nothing shows up. I realize my laziness contributes to my user experience but saying an instance doesn’t know what’s out there and then providing a site that will let me search for what’s out there doesn’t seem logical.

[–] moobythegoldensock@geddit.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could always write something and submit a merge request:

https://github.com/LemmyNet

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

Based on my reading of the other comments here their is a huge push against this type of functionality from folks that understand the service better than I do. I doubt any contributions from an outside perspective would be at all welcomed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

TIL. That explains why I couldn't find some things.

[–] InquisitiveFactotum@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Forgive what is probably a silly naive question...

Can someone point me to an explanation of the federated architecture of lemmy? I haven't found one yet that has helped me build a good mental model. I either get a step-by-step startup guide, or discussions on the merrits/demerits of a distributed system.

I think I've pieced together that it's basically independent "instances" of the machine each with their own communities within. Sort of like if there were multiple instances of reddit, each with its own r/aww or whatever. I don't yet understand, however how these interact/relate/ovelap/collaborate...which I think is the basis for this thread.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 1 year ago

All you need to do is subscribe to it yourself. You don't need to rely on someone else. You can find the place with the search feature on your own, then subscribe so it starts getting pulled in all.

[–] Temperche@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›