this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
413 points (96.0% liked)

Movies

7225 readers
75 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UdeRecife@literature.cafe 29 points 1 year ago

Rock solid review. A bit hard and on the wayside, but still putting it out there.

[–] mlc894@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the movie is impressive in how it took the life of a very interesting man and turned it into something boring. Like, I didn’t even think that was possible beforehand.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Well they do tend to have to tone down American heroes because most are super flawed.

Thru can't even cover some because it would be difficult to explain the huge gaps where freaky shit happened. Like the founder of jpl Jack Parsons, how would you explain the time he hung out on a boat with Hubbard until Hubbard fucked his gf/fiancee and kicked him off the boat. He doesn't like the next three months "practicing magic" which was mostly writing wishes on slips of paper and masturbating onto them.

[–] freamon@endlesstalk.org 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This post was sandwiched between a bunch of posts from the SideOfTheRoad Community in my subscribed feed, so it was weirdly appropriate. Smashed cars, abandoned furniture, Oppenheimer reviews, random toilets ... all to be expected.

[–] ShadedCosmos@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] freamon@endlesstalk.org 1 points 1 year ago

I've already said too much.

[–] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

NGL, I agree.

[–] Mordachai_Shedbacon@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Fuk u Oscars, The Streets have spoken!

[–] iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Haven't even seen it and it has vibes of "this could have been a 90 minute TV special".

If I'm going to the theater, I'm going for a spectacle. Anything less than that can be streamed.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I feel a mini-series would work as well: The pacing was well maintained throughout all three hours and there were enough storylines to properly take breaks from each other.

[–] babypuncher3000@feddit.ch 5 points 1 year ago

I think the cinematography for Openhimer was deliberately and deceptively simple. Nolan leverages the 70 mm format to capture a lot of textures without being heavy handed.

This film was kind of a big departure from Nolan's typical action oriented style. I do think that some of the performances were mid, and the dialogue was a bit droll at times.

That said, I think he is extremely masterful in his ability to tell a story non linearly, which made the overall story more compelling since they packed a person's whole adult life's story into three hours.

I think the ending conveyed the overall point of the film, and still highlights the complexity of human nature.

Overall, I think the Openhimer tries to use subtleties in an era when "bigger is better".

[–] DeriHunter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Got to agree, when you have 75 oled tv with Sonos sound bar + sub and 4k dv releases, it needs to be a real special movie to go to the theater, to watch with loud nasty people who can't put their phone down for 2 hours (and a newly added rent - paying for babysitter lol)

[–] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Disagree.

There's plenty of biopics out there - but this one really has some powerful moments, that benefit from the cinema.

It adds a bit of depth and gravitas.

[–] Uprise42@artemis.camp 7 points 1 year ago

Damn. So close to a perfect 5/7

[–] burgersc12@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

I thought it was a 3.6, not great, not terrible

[–] johnlawrenceaspden@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hate the way Big Concrete Slab is always trying to put down independent film makers in favour of yet another Hollywood blockbuster. #SmashTheSystem #SmashTheSlab

[–] DestroyerOfWorlds@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

that review forum need some more piss, maybe a broken bottle and a couple of needles too.

[–] athos77@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

7/10 with rice.

[–] Sarkore@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't actually seen it yet. I'm wondering if seeing this review every day will keep it that way.

[–] Int@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Imo it’s worth watching. Definitely an experience better had in a theatre or Imax.

Edit: never said it’s the best movie I’ve ever seen, just that I personally enjoyed it in a theater lol

[–] PineapplePartisan@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This just isn’t true. The vast majority of the movie is people talking in rooms. There is nothing really added by the big screen. I wish I had just waited to stream it.

[–] demonquark@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Totally agree with this. The much hyped “nuclear explosion without CGI” looked like a run of the mill action film car bomb. I mean it was a good looking explosion. It just wasn’t wow.

The rest of the film is just … talking. Well-acted talking, well-written talking, but talking.

I liked Oppenheimer. Wasn’t wowed.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wait... they hyped that it wasn't made with CGI?

God damn I fuckin' hate cinema nerds...

[–] Dax87@forum.stellarcastle.net 2 points 1 year ago

Where were y'all like a week ago when everyone was calling this the greatest movie of all time? Well I'm glad I'm not the only one that thought it was just an okay movie!

[–] archiotterpup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the hype of the visuals really let me down. They built it up and then it just felt very flat.

I even found myself agreeing with Truman, of all people. Get that crybaby out of there.

[–] kabe@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's true for me.

The entire build-up to the Trinity test, the explosion and then the shockwave was awesome on a 50 foot tall IMAX screen. It wouldn't have been the same just watching it at home.

[–] Sarkore@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Will defo see it but probably at home now. As someone else mentioned I think I wanted to see it in IMAX for some kickass CGI nuke action. But sounds like it doesn't have it. Hopefully Nolan secures a real nuke for the sequel lol

[–] tenochtitlan@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

I don't know why people haven't mentioned to you the part where Oppenheimer first says "Now I am become death. Destroyer of worlds" is in a sex scene. Nolan has chosen strange ways of framing certain scenes in this movie.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Eh I think it’s worth seeing in IMAX. Especially if you have access to one of the theaters showing it in 70mm film.

Don’t go in expecting “kickass CGI nuke action,” it isn’t that kind of movie. I wasn’t underwhelmed by it, but my expectations weren’t at the level of some people apparently.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like the current system is if they have not totally effed it up then its considered good and if they manage a halfway decent movie then its just the greatest.

[–] sachamato@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a bit scared that this is actually accurate and that going to the cinema might turn into a big disappointment...

[–] Darkmuch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Make sure to find a good concrete block to put your review on afterwards

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago

Seems like a trusted source.