UdeRecife

Thank you for your comment and for bringing in some sanity.

I'm a former cellist, who has been trained in the western cannon, and you're absolutely right.

Music is music. The so-called classical tradition is just hyped up musical culture from the rich and powerful European elite of those days.

There's nothing in it more special or high minded except for the fact that it was a learned tradition. It was especially cultivated to cater to those who were wealthy enough to actually pay for the privilege of having music played to them whenever they feel like listening to it.

I'm over-simplifying, but that's pretty much the gist of it. In the 19th century, and with industrialization, more and more people came to have their own pianos at home, so they too could have music at home whenever they felt like listening. Guys like Brahms made a huge buck back in the day catering to this new public.

The point being that classical music is just a fancy name for that music tradition which, as you correctly pointed out, is a white European thing used to assert a supposed intellectual dominance over other peoples and their own cultures.

Remember, music is music. There's nothing inherently good about classical European music. Actually, if you hear that tradition thoroughly enough (I did), you'll quickly find out that some of it is actually really badly written, even by the so-called great (I'm looking at you, Beethoven, and your Op. 91, Wellington's Victory "Battle Symphony" -- what a piece of crap!).

tl;dr Classical music is indeed a politically charged term with nasty political implications. As a musical tradition, it is indeed over-hyped and made up to be something bigger than it actually is.

Same here. Pinch zooming is now my best friend though.

Great reference. Thanks for that. I'm reading it right now and it's pretty good!

Well, he gave two of them away.

I would say you're actually witnessing the very real phenomenon of language-drift. Languages evolve for a billion reasons, but there's no right or wrong state of language.

That's why we distinguish between language, dialect, idiolect, sociolect. Each bearer of language is also a producer of language. Their version is just theirs, in whatever many ways that makes that version unique.

(Check linguistics to better understand this process of language-drifting )

Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo

Documentary.

You make a good point worth considering. For all non-USians/non-Chinese out there, all those social media giants are foreign corporations belonging to foreign powers.

The spying part of it is bad for the spying, not for who's doing it.

You're not wrong. Why would you? Either works or not. You said it yourself, it's work-related. The rest you could probably work around them if sufficiently motivated.

Sorry if I mistake your intention. If that's the case, it's just me making a wrong guess.

You're probably misreading this.

I authored THE NAME. If you prefer, I'm the name-giver, the author in this sense.

Linus is the namer and the creator of that kernel.

As creator he is by right allowed to name his creation whatever he likes. Just like me, as the cat 'entity creator as a pet' am allowed to name it whatever I like.

No outsiders input required. You get now what I mean by author?

Whatever your reply may be, let me thank you already for engaging. It's nice to be pressured to explain something in simpler, more accessible terms.

Thanks for the necessary XKCD. First time reading that one.

Well, to be honest, I won't be THAT guy, nor am I crazy to bring back the rotary disk.

Thanks!

And no, I'm not serious. Just reminding that technology, like everything else, changes.

But I loved that project! Made me smile thinking how creative people are.

Maybe you'll like it more under this new guise: I named my cat Goofyball. But since Linnaeus named the species Felis catus, you remind me that my cat's name should ackchyually be Felis catus/Goofyball. To which I reply, very appropriately, 'it's MY cat'. So Goofyball it is.

Understand now the authority argument? Authority in the sense of authorial, having an author.