this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
279 points (99.6% liked)

Not The Onion

14875 readers
5787 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education, or FURRIES, Act, filed by Austin-area Republican State Rep. Stan Gerdes, would "prohibit any non-human behavior by a student, including presenting himself or herself, on days other than exempt days, as anything other than a human being."

The law would allow for exempt days, such as Halloween and other school dress-up days.

The law defines "non-human" behavior as "any type of behavior or accessory displayed by a student in a school district other than behaviors or accessories typically displayed by a member of the homo sapiens species," with provided examples being:

Using a litter box for the passing of stool, urine or other human byproducts

A personal or outward display, except during a school play or by a school mascot, through surgical or superficial means of features that are non-human such as using tails, leashes, collars or other accessories designed for pets

Using fur, other than naturally occurring human hair or a wig made to look like human hair

Artificial, animal-like ears

Other physiological features that have not historically been assigned to the human race through a means of natural biological development

Students who bark, meow, hiss or make other animal noises that are not human speech

Licking oneself or others for the purpose of grooming or maintenance.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I think we're running into a phase where Republicans are proposing laws based on shared boomer facebook posts and the like rather then actual concrete issues.

[–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 hour ago

its not a phase!!

[–] theluckyone@discuss.online 28 points 6 hours ago

The party of small government and personal freedoms.

Obviously, they were talking about their personal freedom to dictate the freedom of everyone else.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 28 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Goth girls wore collars when I was in high school, before furries were a thing.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 hours ago

FWIW, furries have have been 'a thing' since at least 1980. (just trivia: I know you're talking about trends in your area)

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 23 points 7 hours ago

Eggs are like $9/dozen.

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

But licking oneself or others for the purpose of affection is still fine, right??

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

sorry Mr Sanders, you and your chicken man are going to jail.

1000001265

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 20 points 8 hours ago

If nothing else in my life, it does make me feel powerful how fucking afraid of me that republicans are.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 20 points 8 hours ago

I'm PROUD that they CUT my Child's Lunch and Teacher's salary so they could focus on THIS!

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 hours ago

yo they can peel my chokers from my cold dead hands

[–] NotLemming@lemm.ee 8 points 7 hours ago

You have to laugh

[–] kbal@fedia.io 52 points 10 hours ago

If enacted, I'm guessing the main effect of this would be to make "meow" the new standard greeting among a large fraction of the student population in Texas high schools.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 38 points 10 hours ago

Hey DOGE, these are the dumbasses wasting taxpayer money.

[–] imsufferableninja@sh.itjust.works 96 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The party of small government

[–] RonnyZittledong@lemmy.world 61 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's just one of several modern versions of satanic panic used to distract the dummies while they fleece them.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago

So many people believe the litter box thing. So many that it made it into this law. We're surrounded by idiots.

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 48 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Using a litter box for the passing of stool, urine or other human byproducts

They put that in the law because they want people to think it actually happens.

It reminds me of the time that a proposed bill outlawed "critical race theory" in schools, which it defined (in part) as teaching that present-day white people must feel guilty about past slavery. But nobody had ever taught that.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They do have cat litter. Its used during lockdowns when a child is locked in their classroom and cant leave to use the restroom. One school in particular that has cat litter is Columbine.

In my day it was also useful for cleaning up puke.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 29 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Students who bark, meow, hiss or make other animal noises that are not human speech

The cow says "you're under arrest".

[–] Colors@lemmy.world 43 points 11 hours ago

It’s actually the pig that says that.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

I find this law hilarious. And incredibly dumb. Hilariously dumb. Maybe spend more on education and childcare. There's always going to be the "wild child" in school.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 44 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Lots of students with verbal communication issues about to be illegal. As are students with artifical limbs or organs or even glucose monitors. Also who gets to decide this: "other than behaviors or accessories typically displayed by a member of the homo sapiens species"?

[–] supernight52@lemmy.world 39 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

It's vague, specifically so they can invoke it against any child they consider part of the "out group"- like trans, n/b, autistic, developmentally handicapped, socially handicapped, awkward, queer, "strange," brown, wrong religion, wrong clothes, wrong facial expression... the list can go on. The cruelty is the point. Fascists are literally comic levels of evil. If you are not one of "them" you are evil, bad, and need removed. Same for the ideologically impure. Shit is going to get extremely crazy within the next few months to year.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

They're already underhandedly targeting autistic kids with it as-is. Vocal stims like meowing or nonverbal communication like growling are covered directly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Homey, they about to defund and empty the DoE, every single person in need of an IEP are about to be screwed. The students wont be illegal, they just wont be allowed in the new private school system for espousing anti-social behaviors.

Edit: I do not adhere or condone destroying the public school system in any way. The fact that the US has been defunding and legislatively attacking public schools since the 60s is deplorable behavior

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 hours ago

What they don't realize is that by doing this they are making it easier to replace the United States Federal government. Prior to this Administration one could make the argument that doing our evolution is hard or an advisable because you would have to recreate systems for inspecting the food and predicting the weather and all of that but at this point? We're going to have to do that anyway so we might as well do so under a fundamentally better system

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 44 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Jesus Christ, someone buy these guys a fursuit already. I'll chip in. We can do a GoFundMe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Calcifer@eviltoast.org 29 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

Okay, obvious queerphobia/freedom of expression issues and "how are these malignant societal tumors still on the debunked litter box thing" aside... Do none of these idiots remember that children often role play as animals because they have imagination and they are children? Have they even met children?!? Pretty sure "horse firefighters" or "we're all evil cats today" etc. are a common type of game played at recess or whatever. They have nothing to do with being a furry and everything to do with just regular human development? Are these people really paranoid and threatened by childhood make-believe games?

[–] NotLemming@lemm.ee 3 points 7 hours ago

I used to be the dog in recess when kids were playing families and I'm barely a sexual deviant at all. Meanwhile grindr goes wild around Republican conferences so they can STFU and leave the furries alone.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 7 hours ago

Leopards? Faces?

[–] Nikelui@lemmy.world 21 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Artificial, animal-like ears Other physiological features that have not historically been assigned to the human race through a means of natural biological development

Great outrage in the anime community following catgirls ban.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 hours ago

As a furry weeb I propose an alliance

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 25 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I love how there's exempt days. You can dress up like a furry once in a while as a treat.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›