this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
46 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3967 readers
229 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 3 points 50 minutes ago (1 children)

Imagine if he'd put all the money he's wasted on failed political campaigns into actually helping people. Man's a fucking monster.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 1 points 5 minutes ago

He only helps himself

[–] TimePencil@infosec.exchange 1 points 8 hours ago

@zero_gravitas
Trump's excrement, like his waistline, is spreading.

[–] guillem@aussie.zone 9 points 14 hours ago

Looking forward to their stance on the value of Pi.

[–] tombruzzo@aussie.zone 11 points 15 hours ago

You couldn't get a better example of the corporate stranglehold on media. Time for everyone to read manufacturing consent

[–] Nanook@lemm.ee 6 points 14 hours ago

Thanks for the snippet about the F1 race in Aussie this weekend.

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 16 points 17 hours ago

I love how The Age put their article about Palmer trying to buy the election with ads right above one of his ads.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Jacquie Lambie's original party.

Trumpet of Patriots, wot even is that supposed to mean, people farting on Australia Day ?

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 6 points 11 hours ago

Whiffing Donald J's brain farts.

[–] spartanatreyu@programming.dev 20 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

There are only two genders...

Except for: <giant list of genetic, epigenetic, developmental, etc... things that happen with human beings>.

Not to mention all the other things that happen with other living things

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 hours ago

You're kind of missing the point.

Everyone knows there are more than 2 genders. It's an easily falsifiable statement.

It's an incendiary statement designed to foment division.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 10 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

bUt tHEy'Re RarE gENeTic ABnoRMAliTiEs

Yeah, and so are red-heads, Karen. In fact, red-heads are rarer than intersex people. Are red-heads not worthy of basic respect and dignity?

[–] Fleur_@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 5 hours ago

I feel like this statistic is probably taken out of context. Like if you look at all of earth it's probably true, 1.7%. of people being intersex and 1-2% of people having red hair. But in places where people actually* have red hair such as northern and western Europe that goes to 2-6% and reduces to basically 0 in places where people of European heritage don't live. So basically what I'm saying is if you live in a place where you regularly see people with red hair you are probably seeing them more often then you are seeing people who are intersex. And the opposite being true too if you don't regularly see people with red hair you see intersex people much more often. Overall I think it's unhelpful in giving a realistic idea of the comparative amount of intersex people.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 11 hours ago

i mean historically the answer seems to be that they aren't worthy of basic respect and dignity, no

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 1 points 11 hours ago

Have you met many?

[–] Railison@aussie.zone 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

There are as many genders as you can think of.

There are two sexes (M/F), but they exist on a continuum rather than a binary.

Also, why are we so obsessed with sex and gender? They want us to be distracted by this bullshit.

Wake up and realise the Class Consciousness!

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 hours ago

except it's not even a continuum it's more like a fucking pick and mix bag

[–] ausgroucho@aus.social 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

@zero_gravitas There are only two types of billionaires. Arseholes and Pricks.

[–] porcelainpitcher@lemmy.today 1 points 12 hours ago

And yet they don't wanna fuck eachother. Just the rest of us.

[–] freamon@preferred.social 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Well, they should have put the pic of the male on the left and the female on the right then, just so they're not adding to any possible "confusion".

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Are you presuming Clive's gender?

[–] TimePencil@infosec.exchange 1 points 7 hours ago

@sqgl
Clive is not a man.
He's an asexual semi-mobile ball of fat.
@freamon

[–] quokka1@mastodon.au 10 points 19 hours ago (3 children)
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

LOL. Clive saw Trump win and ordered his people to lean into identifying as closely with that as they can get away with legally. It’s like scammy electric-car startups a few years ago choosing names that sounded as reminiscent of Tesla as possible (Nikola, Faraday Future) without actually infringing on any trademarks.

The problem of that the plausibly-deniable reading of his new party name, with its Biblical-apocalyptic imagery and emphatic pledge-of-allegiance patriotism, comes across as exceedingly American, to the point where most undecided Australians would take one look and say “yeah, nah”.

[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] somedev@aussie.zone 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Absolutely. Some of those fucked-up stars look like maple or cannabis leaves 😆 It's not like Palmer couldn't have afforded an illustrator, either. Right-wing boomers just love AI garbage for some reason.

Oh, and as a bonus, the Latin is wrong 😆

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 2 points 10 hours ago

You can’t trust an illustrator, as most people who can draw are commies. Which is why AI exists: so right-wing people can get art made without paying some dirty hippie who believes in equality and human rights.

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 5 points 17 hours ago

The Yellow Shit Stain party is trying to be Orange.