this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
570 points (97.5% liked)

Science Memes

13166 readers
3165 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 89 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

This small circle is the sun, absolutely dwarfed by the earth taking up the rest of the frame. Definitely unsettling.

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You shouldn't stare too long at this photo with your naked eye or you'll go blind.

[–] EffortlessEffluvium@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

What if I give my eye undies?

[–] ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Puts in perspective how small Mercury is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] windowsphoneguy@feddit.org 60 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ackchually, that's just a photography of mercury, not the actual planet on your screen.

[–] mEEGal@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

username checks out

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alenalda@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ironically mercury while being the closest planet to the sun, isn't the hottest planet in the solar system. Venus takes that title because of its atmosphere holding so much co2. Im sure its fine were putting so much of it in our atmosphere.

[–] Vinny_93@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah I prefer summer to winter so if we get summer and super summer now I would enjoy that until I'm dead and after that, why should I care?

/s just in case.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Finally my investment on Arctic Beachside property will pay off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Too autistic for this. Why would it be unsettling? Mercury is much smaller than the sun. If it was suddenly bigger in proportion to the sun, then I'd be unsettled.

[–] rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio 38 points 1 week ago

It doesn't exactly unsettle me, but pondering the mind-boggling scale of celestial bodies and the cosmos can certainly be... humbling, I guess?

I had a co-worker a while back who couldn't talk about the great scale of the universe cause he'd get freaked out. It didn't come up much, but when it did, he'd be like, "Please stop, it's stressing me out" so we'd change the subject.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Less about size and more about size and relative distance. Think about being on Mercury and the entire sky is blazing sun - and yet it survives.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

on Mercury and the entire sky is blazing sun

I've never thought about this and holy shit

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's not the case though. Sure the sun would seem bigger on mercury but it's not gonna fill the entire sky.

Edit: According to NASA the sun would appear 3 times bigger and 7 times brighter on mercury.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

It's very hard to convey the size of the sun in a photo. On earth, it isn't bigger than the moon. I don't think I've ever seen, in a real photo, just how massive the sun is. I absolutely dwarfs a planet, which is kind of chilling. I've never seen a photo that shows anything further away from the camera than a planet AND that much bigger.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lauha@lemmy.one 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Mercury is like 30-50 sun's diameters away from the sun. This perspective makes it look like it's almost touching.

Size scale matches though

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah this perspective is weird. It makes it look like the sun takes up 90% of the sky on mercury. That can’t be right though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Looks like a dead pixel.

The scale of the universe continues to blow my mind.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 13 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I'm sorry but my socks are still on. 100% wool.

[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 7 points 1 week ago

Well, my socks are off.

....so are my pants

and underwear

and shirt

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Juice@midwest.social 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess because of perspective, Mercury being millions of miles closer to the camera than it is to the sun, the actual proportions would have the planet being much smaller by comparison

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mercury's apparent size in the sky when close to us is about twice the size as when mercury is in the other side of the sun from us. So mercury would appear about 75% the size it is in this photo of it were next to the sun (so about the same distance away as the sun is).

[–] Juice@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago

Neat! Thanks!

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This reminds me of that part of that space opera I read where there was a nomadic colony on mercury which needed to always be moving at exactly the right speed to stay on the dark side of the terminator.

[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That was in the Red / Green / Blue mars trilogy, one of my favorites. Though I think I've seen the concept in other works as well.

Basically the temp difference between day / night caused contraction of the rail tracks, pushing the whole city forward so it was always just ahead of dawn.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BalderSion@real.lemmy.fan 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wow. I was in middle school and had to do a creative writing assignment, and I wrote a science fiction short story set in a colony on that boundary of Mercury. I thought Mercury was tidal locked. I was praised for my creativity.

I was today years old when I found that Mercury is not tidal locked.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trying to wrap my head around how incromprehensively large even just our sun is always makes me feel dizzy.

We are not even a pale blue dot to most of the universe, and when we disappear nothing will know or remember us.

[–] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My fav sun fact is that it burns 400 million tons of hydrogen each second, and will be doing that for billions of years. That's 400 million tons of the lightest possible element there is. Just absolutely insane how gigantic the mass of the sun is.

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My fav is just that the sun is, all by itself, 99% of the total mass of our solar system. Most of the rest of that 1% is Jupiter.

[–] addie@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago

You're understating it a bit there - the sun is 99.86% of the mass of the solar system by itself. To the nearest whole percent, the solar system consists of 100% "the sun". To the nearest 0.1%, it's 99.9% the sun and 0.1% Jupiter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_mass

[–] SandmanXC@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

TIL the sun is dark brown. Crazy the tricks our minds play.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Proof that light is a particle and not a wave?

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes, but also both. (a simple example follows)

Think of it like you being at work or home. If I check your house, either you're there, or you aren't. If you're there, you're at home, simple. If not at home, you're at work.

Same with your work: either you're there when I check - or you aren't, therefore at home.

But before I check either location (it's understood that you are only in 1 of those 2 places), you are effectively in both places, and neither place, all at once.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)
[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago

Checkmate physicists

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Science Journalists; Neil Degrasse Tyson claims dead pixels may actually be Mercury sized planets!

[–] JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

How is the next transit of Venus not until 2117? That blows my socks’ mind. Seems like that should be happening very regularly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

From that picture, it looks like you'd be on mercury and look up, see nothing but sun, But realistically it's 60% closer than earth

looks kinda like this from the surface

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Im struggling to parse this. The picture of the sun with the tiny dot when compared with the artists impression you posted. It just wont click together. How can the sun appear so big from the telescope compared to mercury but be so small from mercury's perspective?

Edit. Actually i think it clicked. Mercury is so far from us and so smalkl that it appears like a small dot through that telescope even when zoomed in enough to see the sun that closley. Its actually still really far from the sun but our perspective and that flat picture makes it seem like its about to be consumed by the sun. If it was off to the side the distance would be more clear.

So more like this

S---‐-------------------------------M--------------------------------------V----------------------------------E

Than

S---M‐---------------------------------------------------------------------V----------------------------------E

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Yep, zoom and narrow aperture really messes with perspective.

It's kind of opposite of the tilt shift photos that make real life things look fake.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HeliosPhoebus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And this is why I worship the Sun

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

My socks were appropriately blown off but I still didn't get invited.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago

Praise the sun!

load more comments
view more: next ›