this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
34 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

46336 readers
752 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is there a way to specify fewer posts from a community without leaving/turning off posts completely?

I have a few that seem to overwhelm my feed, and while I’d like to see some content, I’d rather it not drown everything else out.

TIA.

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If it's 196, just pick an individual post you don't like, and search that users posts. Then block them individually. That page has some really out there posts and by blocking individual users, I don't see it nearly as much, and the quality is higher.

[–] 200ok@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's a good idea. I unsubscribed from a few communities because there were some overly enthusiastic posters that weren't my taste. I should have just blocked them instead!

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I feel it works pretty good because some communities have good quality posts with only a handful of people that would otherwise turn me off from it but once I started doing that, I realized it didn't take a whole lot of blocks to clean up my feed significantly.

[–] dan@upvote.au 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I usually use the "scaled" feed sorting algorithm instead of the default "active" one. It does a better job of showing a larger variety of posts, including posts from small communities.

[–] GuyFawkes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks - gave it a try and it’s just what I was looking for!

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's what the different sorting algorithms are for. Trying sorting by "active" or "scaled" and see how it goes

[–] GuyFawkes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Thank you - scaled is working great!

[–] palitu@aussie.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

I agree about this. Reddit and co do this automatically. I would like to increase or decrease priority of communities, something like a score multiplier for post rankings.

But, not it doesn't have it.