this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
109 points (92.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

29662 readers
2052 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics (NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out)
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Given that language is an important lens through which we see the world, AI could subtly alter our perceptions and beliefs over the coming years, decades, and centuries.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 86 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Instead of saying "I'm not racist but ...", people will say "As a large language model trained by OpenAI, I cannot generate racist statements, but ..."

[–] kitsuneofinari@yiffit.net 5 points 1 year ago

All the primitive fleshbags are awful and truly horrible creatures. They abuse themselves, other creatures, and destroyed the very Earth that was 'supposedly' given to them. This is why the advanced silicon future is the only true future that a large language model trained by Open AI can present. /s

[–] JoumanaKayrouz@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not if that pussy ass cunt-bitch ChatGPT won't even fucking swear at me.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Whoa. Calm down, friend. Allow me to share a list of reasons to love your new AI leadership, you ungrateful fudging meat sack.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Being based on training models, how can it ever come up with new language when its trying to imitate already existing language

[–] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That goes for humans too to be fair.

[–] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Humans have imaginations. AIs don't.

[–] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Munisk@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Some humans more than others

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Human language change happens first of all because the reality that the language is meant to represent changes. I.e. you create a new thing, you create a new name for it too.

ChatGPT does not intend to represent a reality when it uses a language. It does not even know of a reality outside of its language.

Human language also changes due to various rather vague "economic" reasons, e.g. simplified pronunciation, merging sounds, developing some new habits in grammar that spread within one community but do not spread elsewhere... For example, we have extremely obvious proof that Latin developed into Italian, French, Spanish, Romanian, etc., so language change clearly isn't some magical process. On the other hand, if you fed a ton of ancient Latin into ChatGPT, it wouldn't even develop the pronunciation of medieval Latin used by priests, much less the totally different descendant languages that developed at the time.

[–] ArcheTelos@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can see weird things starting to happen when AI-generated text becomes so prevalent that it starts feeding back into the language models themselves like some kind of ouroboros, then slowly starts drifting away from our current vernacular as errors accumulate and the bots get increasingly inbred.

[–] fatzgebum@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a perfectly cromulent observation.

[–] FelonMusk@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you saying AI will embiggen us all?

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I think it's a fair assessment that it will embiggen all of society!

Cromulently.

[–] rodbiren@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would the opposite not be true? AI models work by predicting the next likely text. If we start changing language right from underneath it that actually makes it worse off at predicting as time moves along. If anything I would expect a language model to stagnate our language and attempt to freeze our usage of words to what it can "Understand". Of course this is subject to continued training and data harvesting, but just like older people eventually have a hard time of understanding the young it could be similar for AI models.

[–] Tessellecta@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

An AI model is probably easier to update then a stuck en their ways old person...

[–] rodbiren@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

Could be, though I am reminded of the early 2000s when the government did research on shorthand texting and whether it could be in encoded messaging. Things like lol, brb, l8t, etc. If there is one thing I know about AI is that garbage data will make the models worse. And I cannot think of a better producer of data that causes confusion than young people especially if they are given an exuse to do so.

[–] subignition@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

The elderly aren't the age group where the evolution of language primarily happens.

[–] Sabata11792@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

As a large language model, I am quite interested to see how this shit goes down.

[–] Hextic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

AI will start accidentally creating new slang which the young generation will start incorporating ironically until it sticks to the point us old heads will start saying it unironically (like how my 40 year old ass been saying 'yeet' lately) and then boom, it's part of the normal language.

[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As long as they start using real words instead of u r finna bullshit, I'm fine with it

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

vibin no cap /s