this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
180 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19274 readers
2177 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The incoming Trump administration is expected to transform the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) into a pro-business agency, reversing pro-worker decisions made during Biden’s presidency.

Anticipated changes include firing pro-labor officials like General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo and overturning rulings that bolstered unionization efforts, such as limits on “captive audience meetings,” quicker union elections, and protections for workers' heated speech.

Legal challenges from companies like Amazon and SpaceX aim to strip the NLRB of its authority entirely, while Trump’s alignment with figures like Elon Musk signals intensified opposition to unions and labor rights.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago

You'd have to be a complete imbecile to think Republicans or conservatives would ever benefit your union. Like checks notes Trump voters.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We need an app to organize wildcat strikes without leaders. Ditching work isn't a crime and they're taking away our protections anyways.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This, bittorrent but encrypted for organizing. Be part of the Swarm.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

I think that you're thinking i2p torrent. It's not necessarily encrypted, but it's extremely difficult to trace.

(I've never managed to make i2p work for some reason. I assume I'm fucking up somewhere, but I don't know where.)

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

The leadership probably knows; I wonder if all those in the trenches (that supported donvict, because "manliness" or whatever) do.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Faces meet leopards.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Go ahead, make us slaves. All of us. You spent the better half of the last decade turning the rubes rabid. Your own fostered hate will consume you.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

when the rubes went maga, the urbanites became blue-maga and both combined unwittingly walked us towards this this oligarchical descent and will walk us further into it 2026 and/or 2028.

place blame where it's due: on americans who refuse to learn that this is the natural progression of all capitalists systems and that it takes true collective action to prevent it; not people who "don't like politics" nor simply donations/votes to a party.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

blue-maga

Not a thing

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Democrats are rubes, too. Anyone who couldn't guess where Citizens United would take us is a rube. This country is built on the backs of rubes who thought they were guiding billionaire cock toward the hole they wanted it to fuck.

[–] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago

The labor board is the compromise position, the alternative is the Haymarket affair.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Workers can cooperate whether they officially have a union or not.

"Pay us the raise you know we due or you can replace all of us".

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

The latter is what actually happened to air traffic controllers under Reagan. Reagan saw all of the strikers fired, and used military (?) ATCs until the airports hired new ones. I would not be surprised if the same tactics were used to break any strike by 'essential' workers. Longshoreman strike? Fire 'em all, use active-duty military to replace them, the hire new, lower-paid ones, and automate (longshoremen unions are threatening to strike over attempts to automate large parts of their job).