"don't threaten us, please," from the dumbass that said "official acts" have blanket immunity?
get bent.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
"don't threaten us, please," from the dumbass that said "official acts" have blanket immunity?
get bent.
With all due respect Mr. Roberts, this is known as reaping what you sow.
Precedence was established in the landmark case FA v. FO
Maybe don't support a fascist take over then? Whoops too late for that.
"Corrupt Official Prefers Compromising Integrity for Bribes Instead of Threats"
It's like an Onion headline.
So do bribery and corruption but eh, those he doesn't mind so much
What praytell is the recourse left to the public for the open blatant corruption of Justice Thomas et al., Mr. Robert's? You dipshits undermined yourselves.
"judicial independence"
Haha. Thats the best joke I've heard all day. We still get to keep our sense of humor at least, so thats something.
Is he saying he needs an RV or a yacht or something?
And then there's stuff like judges revoking the FTC ban on Non Compete Agreements. I can't imagine why there might be ~~discussions about judicial reform~~ threats
Right. Because they were such paragons of independence before.
Roberts is a cuck and a shitbag.
Wait. Is he saying they could be LESS independent (than their current "tip" model)?
He's afraid that they'll lose all power, and the bribes will stop, and the threats start coming instead.
How about "If you fuckers aren't going to have judicial independence anyway, might as well not have it on our terms."
Lolz
The greater risk is from corruption. Roberts doesn't seem interested in discussing that, though.