What praytell is the recourse left to the public for the open blatant corruption of Justice Thomas et al., Mr. Robert's? You dipshits undermined yourselves.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
"judicial independence"
Haha. Thats the best joke I've heard all day. We still get to keep our sense of humor at least, so thats something.
Is he saying he needs an RV or a yacht or something?
"don't threaten us, please," from the dumbass that said "official acts" have blanket immunity?
get bent.
With all due respect Mr. Roberts, this is known as reaping what you sow.
Precedence was established in the landmark case FA v. FO
"Corrupt Official Prefers Compromising Integrity for Bribes Instead of Threats"
It's like an Onion headline.
Maybe don't support a fascist take over then? Whoops too late for that.
And then there's stuff like judges revoking the FTC ban on Non Compete Agreements. I can't imagine why there might be ~~discussions about judicial reform~~ threats
So do bribery and corruption but eh, those he doesn't mind so much
The greater risk is from corruption. Roberts doesn't seem interested in discussing that, though.
Right. Because they were such paragons of independence before.
Roberts is a cuck and a shitbag.
Wait. Is he saying they could be LESS independent (than their current "tip" model)?
He's afraid that they'll lose all power, and the bribes will stop, and the threats start coming instead.
How about "If you fuckers aren't going to have judicial independence anyway, might as well not have it on our terms."
Lolz