A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
I work for the US gov't (in a very different capacity), and know folks who won't write anything down, and will only talk in person or maybe on the phone. They will send a message to meet in their office, or come to my room. I'm not even involved in sensitive stuff. Madness.
Yep, and others do the exact opposite, insist on having a paper trail for everything in case some bullshit gets pinned on them.
Good indicator of their honesty level.
This is pretty much me, and it has saved me for sure! I don't expect myself to remember everything, but I need backup when there is a dispute.
I've found people that want a paper trail on every tiny thing to be weaselly, don't trust 'em a bit. The reverse is true as well. When someone goes out of their way to keep all communications oral and private, yeah, weasels.
I've bumped up against some federal govt (US) contracting work, and have seen this for sure. I've seen some (decision-making!) individuals who behave this way, impacting progress so badly that it truly smells like a compromised person / spy. It's really that nuts sometimes, where the more plausible answer is that the person in question is not acting in good faith.
If you’re with someone like this, the best course of action is to write down what was said in person and email it to them after the meeting, saying something like "just confirming these were the takeaways from our recent meeting". If they have a legitimate reason (one their superiors will accept) to tell you not to do that (and they have the power over you to give that order), then ah well, at least you tried and you’ll at least have that on the record. But it’s also quite likely that they’re trying to pull a fast one that their bosses wouldn’t be happy with.
I'm definitely aware of that move, you can kinda tell who has gotten burned the worst (or maybe just most recently) by this behavior - by how insistent they are about the paper trail.
For me, I'd rather fuck off altogether, I want to work with people who want to get shit done. This nonsense is for the terminally unproductive, and that ain't me.
But, alas, myself and many others...ya play the hand you're dealt, I guess. Working on swapping some cards though.
"Nothing to hide, nothing to fear."
Weird how that only applies to some of us...
That sounds quite illegal/against codes. Government agencies usually want a papertrail solely for their internal accountability and documentation. Of course there can be stuff "off the record", but when it comes to decisionmaking, there should be some reason given on the record and that reason better looks plausible enough.
Gonna have to start recording everything said while on the clock.
Fuck this subversive bullshit.