this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
466 points (97.0% liked)

politics

18870 readers
4887 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lifecoach5000@lemm.ee 82 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“I could care less”

Well that means she does care a little bit at least.

[–] SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I hate that saying it makes no sense at all. It’s couldn’t care less ya dumbasses

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 year ago

Meaning dumbass MTG is a dumbass.

But seriously, we've got to get people like her and Bobo the Clown out of office. It's a tragedy that they ever got in. Gatty Matty is also terrible, as is Cruise Controller, but the absolute idiocy of these Empty G and Bobe is stunning. Then again, I guess the pan taught me how large the portion of absolute morons we have in the population. It makes me sad.

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It basically means they care, albeit a little bit but it's more than not at all. Frankly, I couldn't care less.

[–] KreekyBonez@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if there's an inflection with appropriate stress, it's a fairly sarcastic play on the phrase. "I could care less" says that they can care a little, but refuse to do so.

however, the way it's used here doesn't generally reflect that. and, if it isn't used in response to direct question about level of care, then it is fully toothless as a phrase.

to be clear, you're right; I'm just playing devil's advocate about how that wording was intended to be used. when it's overused without context, it's a pointless play on words, and generally annoying to see written or spoken.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I heard it as, "I could care less, but I'd have to try." As in, it's not worth the effort to care less about the topic.

[–] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

That doesn't work, neither does what the other guy said.

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

But, even in that use case they admit they could care less, and caring less not being worth the effort makes no logical sense as doing nothing (not caring) takes less effort than doing something (caring a little bit).

[–] zerkrazus@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

It'll be a good day when I never have to see or hear about her ever again. GTFO Marge.

[–] cpo@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Karen face on that creature should be enough to kick her out.

[–] norske@lemmynsfw.com 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We should stop calling them Karens and start calling them Marjories

[–] Late2TheParty@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] StealthToad@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thirded. Give Karens’ their name back, Marjorie’s is much more fitting

[–] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Nay. Too many syllables.

[–] Shit@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She's a methhead and child groomer who exchanges sexual acts for house votes; not sure why this is taking so long to do anything but I guess these are the family values Americans crave.

[–] DoctorWhookah@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have most certainly been hard up at times, but I cannot imagine a scenario where I would willfully have any sort of naked time with that vile unscrupulous woman.

[–] Shit@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯ she's called herself a "tantric sex guru" in the past.

[–] Thteven@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If that were true she wouldn't be such a bitter old cunt.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah? Look who she's fucking...

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Wish I could say the same of Boebert

[–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Holy hell. If a Democrat did that, faux news would never shut up about them.

[–] greendakota99@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bro, we cannot forget about Hunter’s business dealings!

[–] homesnatch@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is "business dealings" slang for his penis?

[–] gornar@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Very legal, and very cool!

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It seems censuring doesn't actually do anything

A vote to censure another member of Congress does not hold any other power beyond a public condemning of that member’s behavior. It does not expel a member from Congress or deny the rights or privileges of that member within Congress.

The Senate website says a censure can have a “powerful psychological effect” on the member and can subsequently threaten the relationships they have with their colleagues. The House website notes that a censure makes the House’s “deep disapproval” of a member publicly known but does not warrant an expulsion.

Yeah, I don't think it's going to have much "psychological effect" on her. Should just vote to expel her.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So it would have as much effect as the house voting to "denounce socialism" earlier this year

Yeah if she is able to do the morally reprehensible things she's done in the past already, this will do specifically nothing.

If morals won't hold her, an authorative side glance will do jack shit.

[–] Venomnik0@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why is she starting to look more orange with that thumbnail?

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

"with Greene visiting Jan. 6 inmates in a Washington jail and calling it the “patriot wing,” calling Muslim members of Congress part of the “Jihad Squad,” and appearing at a white nationalist event "

JFC

[–] Potato_in_my_anus@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Good or bad publicity does not matter, the publicity is...

[–] mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

What a waste of time article. Dems don’t control the house, this will go nowhere. This is as stupid as reporting on bills that everyone knows won’t even make it to the floor.

It’s feel-good fluff that won’t make any changes.

load more comments
view more: next ›