this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
324 points (95.8% liked)

politics

19159 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A video which features Ron DeSantis that includes a symbol often associated with neo-Nazi groups has been met with outrage after it was allegedly retweeted by his campaign team.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why is there even outrage at this point? It's not a secret these people are Nazis. They've barely hidden it. Thankfully, DeSantis has no chance at all.

[–] manillaface@kbin.social 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don’t get complacent. That was the word about Trump until he won in ‘16.

[–] islandofcaucasus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I was worried about DeSantis at first, but he's a value brand Trump. He doesn't get people riled up like Trump does. I'm still worried about Trump though. I drink think he could win again but I didn't think he'd win in 2016

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

DeSantis doesn't get the right riled up, but he is effective in ruining everything intentionally like McConnell. He won't get the Republicsn nomination till Trump dies, but he will probably be the successor.

[–] echo@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

He's effective at ruining everything in Florida, where he has Reublican supermajorities in the legislature to back him up. I'm not convinced he's actually an effective politician like McConnell.

[–] PhoenixRising@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I don't think the corporate sponsors of the gop will allow DeSantis. Trump was VERY good for business, DeSantis has shown that he is a threat and can't play nice.

[–] GiddyGap@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

There's fortunately a lot more opposition to Trump this time around. Hopefully enough to keep him out of office.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

DeSantis is going against Trump. It's very clear who Republicans like more.

EDIT: So sorry, I have no idea what happened.

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

They're trying to present it as if it was shocking, to "subtley" deny what they are.

It all falls into their mindset of thinking most people secretly agree with them. They're idiots who think it is some clever ruse to rally support.

[–] SangriaFerret@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"Newsweek has not been able to verify if it had been shared, or the account from which the clip was retweeted from. '

So... They just published this article without confirming that it even happened? I'm not doubting that it did because it seems pretty on brand but you would think a major news outlet would make sure before they publish an article stating it did.

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

News gotta go fast, 24 hour news cycle and still not enough time for all of it. Fact checking? That's for losers, and if you're not first you're a loser.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago

Take my angry upvote; it's true; getting there first matters more than getting it right for those views. They maybe go back and edit later.

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Was hoping we could do better here at not just sharing and upvoting articles based on titles, but this is already in my TopDay, so...

[–] tigerjerusalem@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Holy crap. In other countries people would be arrested for using fascist and nazi imagery. What kind of hell hole is the US becoming?

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Becoming? The only reason why Nazi ideology didn't take off in America in the 1930s was because American conservatives wanted a home-grown fascism, not that imported shit.

Even so, there was that massive Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden that everyone forgets about. Allen Dulles, who went on to become the head of the CIA when it was formed, is said to have shed real tears when America declared war on Germany.

It was also an American Neo-Nazi who created Holocaust Denialism.

[–] nan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

America First was only one such group, the German Abwehr was very active in America.

Father Coughlin had a radio audience of tens of millions and literally read Goebbels’ propaganda over the air. He had his own militia group.

The Silver Legion was another one.

A man named Leon Lewis formed a civilian spy ring that was tracking Nazis in Los Angeles. One of its members even warned congress of a planned attack on the Hercules Powder plant a year before it was blown up (cause still officially unknown).

I think Pearl Harbor is the main reason this stuff was stopped.

[–] Literati@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The podcast Ultra by Rachel Maddow goes into the history of this period and is really good

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

A confederate one

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 3 points 1 year ago

Somehow, we've fully confused facts for opinions, and now you're just allowed to say whatever hateful nonsense you want because pearl-clutching centrists don't believe anyone can make restrictions on speech that couldn't be abused.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (28 children)

I guess Rhonda Sandtits is trying really hard to be as equally awful as the orange shitstain that he’s running against

[–] Sjohnson26@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 year ago

And it’s (thankfully) failing terribly because he has about as much charisma and personality as a potato. Nothing about him seems authentic. It’s like his campaign thought “Hmmm what do Trump supporters like? Nazis and fascism? Yeah let’s run with that.” and it’s clearly not connecting.

It’s like he’s running as a parody of Trump. A cheap generic knockoff. And so far it appears the GOPers want the name brand.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Is anyone even remotely surprised? This is all Republicans are anymore.

“Predictable”, more like

[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We've had Nazis protesting all over Orlando and Tampa practically every weekend these days, yet our governor and his surrogates just encourages more of this Nazi crap.

Thankfully we have Volusia county Sheriff Mike Chitwood actively trying to arrest as many of these Nazi fuckers that he can get proof of wrongdoing for, he seems to be the only authority figure in the state actually trying to do something about the growing Nazi infestation we've got going on here in Florida.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The competition to see who is the most racist.

[–] progressquest@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I see some people that are suggesting that, while that symbol might be popular with nazies, it is likely too ubiquitous to bo only popular with the nazis. That might be true, but political figures should probably exercise a bit more caution than the average citizen when it comes to these kinds of things, if only for the optics.

On the other hand, it is likely tedious to go through all of the media that passes through a political campaign to ensure that these types of things are caught, even if there are staffers assigned to specifically these types of things.

On the other, other hand, it is probably simpler to just not agree with nazis.

[–] ErwinLottemann@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago
[–] hardypart@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're already putting "retweeted" into quotation marks, lol

[–] loobkoob@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

It's more aesthetically pleasing and rolls off the tongue better than "regurgitated xcrement"

[–] thefloweracidic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anyone know the source video? Or the account that tweeted this?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] exohuman@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Anyone have an archive link to the post and video? I want to share it. People need to know.

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Is "wojack" really associated with nazis, or is this another pepe the frog situation?

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Me: I don't know what that is, let me check the article

Sees the picture

Me: uh, yeah, that looks like some obvious nazi or nazi suggestive, shit

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›