this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
103 points (91.2% liked)

World News

39390 readers
2384 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov stated that Russia rejects a weak ceasefire in Ukraine, instead seeking a legally binding peace deal ensuring the security of Russia and its neighbors.

Lavrov accused the West of using truces to re-arm Ukraine and called for agreements preventing future violations.

President Putin expressed readiness for talks with Trump but ruled out territorial concessions or Ukraine’s NATO membership, a key Russian concern.

Ukraine remains committed to pursuing NATO membership despite Russia’s objections.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Just a whore arguing over the price. The most natural thing in the world for a Russian politician.

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

I've carefully considered Russia's concerns and security, and after 3 years I've ultimately decided that I don't give a fuck about Genocidal Fascist Warmonger's Fee-fees.

Ukraine's sovereingty doesn't end where Russian hurt feelings begin.

[–] recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee 26 points 16 hours ago

You find a way to force Russia to hand all their nuclear weapons to NATO and you got yourself a deal. Ukraine will even promise not to invade Russia once that is done.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 21 points 15 hours ago

Bro, literally nobody is threatening Russia besides you clowns.

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago

Code for: no NATO for Ukraine, we get some time to build up and have another crack in a few years

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 52 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Ok, so a return to 1994 and the Budapest memorandum[0]. Sounds good to me!

Remember, Russia is the only offensive party in all of this.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 39 points 19 hours ago

I'm sure we can give the same security guarantees Ukraine got, in exchange for Russia similarly giving up its nuclear weapons.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 118 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Your security was not an issue until you invaded Ukraine. You didn't want NATO on your border (even though it already was there in Kaliningrad)? Now you have it.

No one was talking about Finland joining NATO until you invaded Ukraine. Ukraine itself wasn't pursuing NATO membership until you invaded.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 40 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Kaliningrad

Also Poland, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Canada (if you don't count the Arctic).

The idea that Ukraine joining NATO made any kind of difference to Russia's security is absolutely ludicrous.

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 41 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Nevermind the fact that annexing Ukraine would also have moved their border to NATO.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 21 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, exactly.

It genuinely worries me that people struggle to see through bullshit this obvious.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Literally nobody who isn't just a Russian troll is confused by this.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

No, sadly I've seen a lot of well meaning leftists get caught up in this bullshit. Not denying that Russian trolls have been intentionally spreading their talking points, but I've also seen them repeated by far too many people who should know better.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

People you know in real life?

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

IRL and online. It happens way too often.

A big part of it is that a lot of modern leftists were kind of forged in the post 9/11 culture and the reaction against Bush's forever wars, and they in turn inherited much of their political conscience from elder leftists who were forged in the Nixon years and the reaction against the Vietnam war.

So its become a kind of fait a complit on the left that being anti-war and anti American Imperialism is always good and necessary. And those are good positions to hold, but the problem is that people don't come to them through interrogative thought. They're just sort of handed to you as part of your welcome package. So when presented with a scenario where supporting the continuation of a military conflict - even when that support aligns you with the interests of US global influence - is actually a moral good, a lot of these people really struggle to break free of their own thought terminating cliches.

The Ukraine conflict simply does not fit into the same boxes that they're used to sorting ideas into, and because, by and large, most leftists detest war on a purely moral level (understandable, no one should be overjoyed at the notion of vast destruction of human life, though a depressingly large number of people are) they simply haven't spent enough time interrogating these ideas to have built a framework to handle complex cases like this.

Russia very carefully frames their propaganda to exploit these moral conflicts. NATO is a military alliance, ergo "NATO bad". America is an imperialist power, ergo anything that serves American interests is bad. Military conflicts lead to unacceptable loss of life, ergo anything which prolongs a conflict is bad. These are easy answers to complicated problems, so people naturally latch onto them.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 18 hours ago

That was just the excuse. Ukraine is a mineral-rich breadbasket. They had stuff Russia wants. Simple as that. Just like the US invading Iraq had nothing to do with "spreading democracy".

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 59 points 22 hours ago

“Now that I’m done beating the shit out of you, what guarantee do I have that you won’t fight back, because that would just be mean”

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

Russia’s security wasn’t at issue but the regime’s security was. Russia is like the regimes from 1984: they need constant external threats to wage war against in order to distract the opposition at home.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 95 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Lavrov accused the West of using truces to re-arm Ukraine and called for agreements preventing future violations.

Russia wants time to rearm, but doesn't want the people they're attacking doing the same thing.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 45 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Typical fascist rhetoric: accuse others of what you want to do

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

accuse others of what you want to do

Hey, that's Republican territory.

[–] reddwarf@feddit.nl 14 points 17 hours ago

Typical fascist rhetoric

Republican territory

I do believe @sexy_peach was not stuttering or being confused

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 17 points 21 hours ago

Exactly, and we're need to be extra careful when talking about any deal: https://youtu.be/MhpoNL1gZbw

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 23 points 19 hours ago

STFU moscow

[–] goatsarah@thegoatery.dyndns.org 35 points 22 hours ago

@MicroWave Hey Russia, you could try not invading people if you’re worried about them fighting back?

Delusional nonsense from Moscow as usual.

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago

I wonder what noises this asshole would make if a large pointy 2x4 traversed him in reverse from arse to piehole. Would it be similar to bear love making? I hope someone out there, who knows where a bear might be, could unite them to have a good listen.

Is that too much? 2X4 instead?

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 9 points 20 hours ago

fuck you ruZZia.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 11 points 21 hours ago

Autocrats accusing the other side of what they are doing themselves. Old as time.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It’s hard to tell by the article if Lavrov believes the bullshit he’s spewing, or if he’s just the poor guy who has to spin Putins bullshit or else fall off a balcony

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

By this moment, he had many opportunities to disappear, I believe.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 21 hours ago

May he feel secure in a cell

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Suck my dick, blyat.