this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
75 points (97.5% liked)

Asklemmy

44157 readers
1625 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit - y'all are awesome! I'm gonna check out all of these - thank you!!

--

A family member is moving out of country and convinced the best way to keep in touch is with WhatsApp. I really don't want to install any Meta shit on my phone.

Any recommendation for a FOSS or other alternative from a company that's less of an ethical dumpster fire?

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sag@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 30 points 3 days ago (3 children)

As is the highest up vote, Signal. However, if you refuse to install WA (you should) and they refuse to install Signal (scold them for being dumb), a backup is to bridge WhatsApp with Matrix and use Element on your phone. Way more complicated than Signal and I still strongly recommend they use Signal.

[–] geoma@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah but IMHO bridging whatsapp misses the point. We need people to start being aware and choosing conscious ethical pieces of software for the sake of humanity.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 2 days ago

Agreed, which is why I phrased it the way I did.

[–] DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

a backup is to bridge WhatsApp with Matrix and use Element on your phone

Any recommendations on where to start learning how to set up a bridge like that?

[–] Lem453@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Does this work with WhatsApp groups chat?

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, here's the supported features for the recommended bridge: https://matrix.org/ecosystem/bridges/whatsapp/

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is cool, are there downsides? Like will messages be strangely formatted or anything for my contacts?

Also, are there bridges for other apps? Signal, telegram, messenger? I'd love to have one messenger app to rule them all

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Works great for me. Only oddity is "quotes" in Discord sometimes dont show the content unless you tap on them. And yes, look at the bridges page for more. https://www.beeper.com/ is a hosted version of this with a custom app.

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago

Nice, thanks I'll check it out

[–] nick@midwest.social 149 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Seconded - it even has a much better way of dealing with media attachments.

Just make sure you configure a PIN and backups.

[–] Jackhammer_Joe@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago
[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 3 days ago
[–] jbaber@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 4 days ago (3 children)

For my family member who moved out of country, signal's voice quality was not very good. WhatsApp's quality was better than a regular phone call, very impressive.

Also, outside the US WhatsApp is some kind of standard the way rich Americans think iMessage is. Companies will ask her to contact them on WhatsApp, so she'll have to have it regardless of your personal involvement.

There's also jitsi.

[–] riot@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Also, outside the US WhatsApp is some kind of standard the way rich Americans think iMessage is. Companies will ask her to contact them on WhatsApp, so she'll have to have it regardless of your personal involvement.

That really depends on the country that the family member is moving to, and is not an absolute thing world-wide.

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 2 points 3 days ago

Here goes to hoping that EU massages Whatsapp third party compatibility actually works. It would be great if Signal decided to enter the program, so that I could start recommending it to friends and family as a full on replacement, while not losing the ability to communicate with those who use WhatsApp.

I understand Signal stance, but it would honestly be better to have a mainstream alternative to Whatsapp that actually cares about privacy, rather than a niche product nobody uses

[–] Vitaly@feddit.uk 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Do you think signal's voice quality is not as good as whatsapp? It might be because they have less servers than whatsapp

Whatsapp and telegram calls are P2P for contacts by default. P2P might reduce call issues which i'm not sure signal does that or not

[–] HotCoffee@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

SimpleX Chat, no phone number or e-mail registration needed. Truly a privacy pioneer.

[–] bradboimler@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

SimpleX Chat

I was curious. I'm even more curious how this thing works without user identifiers.

Edit: The Play listing makes things clearer

[–] LifeLemons@lemmy.ml 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Signal or XMPP are good option

XMPP may be a bit overwhelming as you need to select a provider and a client. Doesn't require phone number.

Signal is private and easy to use like whatsapp. Needs phone number to use.

Telegram is cool but encryption isnt enabled by default, would like to avoid it for this. Cool for public groups.

Edit: Teleram isnt good at all, dont use it. Look reason in the replies

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Telegram's MTProto has, to my knowledge, never undergone any security audits. It's a roll-your-own-encryption, which is always dubious when you're unwilling to have it audited. I would never suggest Telegram, even for cleartext communications.

[–] LifeLemons@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 days ago

Agreed, I will edit the comment

Are telegram's secret chats using MTProto? Also i have seen many claims saying it have been audited. They do public bug hunt contest with huge sum as reward to test this afaik

[–] airikr@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 days ago

XMPP. Oh, wait, company based.

  • Signal if you want phone number based signups.
  • SimpleX Chat if you want to experience full privacy.
  • Threema if you want basically the same as SimpleX Chat, but want to give them money first.

But XMPP would be the best option. Snikket is recommended for easy setup.

[–] PullPantsUnsworn@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 days ago

Signal. Though SimpleX is growing as a superior private messenger.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Signal, Matrix/Element, Wire

[–] gregor@gregtech.eu 8 points 4 days ago

Maybe not wire, it's not very widely used and the app is a bit meh

[–] unknown1234_5@kbin.earth -5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'd recommend just regular texting, but if for whatever reason you can't/don't want to the. matrix should work, it's basically foss discord.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Why would you recommend texting as an alternative?

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Otherwise you don’t get all operators being able to read your messages, all the vulnerabilities of SS7 (so not only your operator, any random dude with experience can read your messages)

So many advantages!

But it is compatible with iChat that it is what really matters, really πŸ˜‚

[–] unknown1234_5@kbin.earth 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

not as an alternative to Whatsapp, I mean not bothering with an alternative to texting. there is no need for something like Whatsapp because everything it does is already part of just texting normally. Whatsapp is a texting alternative, and as such is pointless.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Texting doesn’t do end-to-end encryption though, which is a dealbreaker for many.

[–] unknown1234_5@kbin.earth 2 points 2 days ago

sure but if Whatsapp was in consideration security clearly isn't.