this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
108 points (88.6% liked)

World News

39380 readers
2613 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

World GDP: $105.4 trillion USD

(page 2) 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 83 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Does it have to be diamonds? Could we maybe use the ashes of billionaires instead?

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Human ashes are mostly carbon, so yes, of course. We'll run out of billionaires pretty quickly, though.

[–] vikingr@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago

Sounds like a win-win tbh

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

Let's give it a trial run with a few thousand then we can measure the impact and reevaluate.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

That’s a problem that solves it self

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

We’ll just have to try and find out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Of all the aerosols they could think about!

No chance at all of a basically indestructible material not being destructed if absorbed by lungs (or gills) and leading to some disease. You don't need to check. There's no way this could go wrong.

Or, rather... I believe lead is cheaper... Given how much people like to use it, maybe it's a better option.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I was thinking asbestos...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago

They got a headline. Mission achieved.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yes, let's just have everyone on Earth breathe in diamond dust all day every day. There's no way that could be bad for our health.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

That amount sounds like total bullshit. Diamonds can be manufactured and once that is done at scale, it won't be all that expensive. Even at $10000 a ton, five million tonnes would cost just 50 billion.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

$10000/ton is $5/lb from a quick google search they are about $250/lb for industrial diamonds. So 50* 50 or 2500 billion or 2.5 trillion with no idea if they can use run of the mill industrial diamonds or if there will be additional processing to get them into the aerosolized form also how are you going to launch them, and for how many years would we need to do it

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

These are not good ideas. Remember that global warming is just an overarching effect of pollution which we will still have. What diamond dust pollution effects will be, no one knows, but I doubt we want to find out.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

The fossil fuel oligarchy would prefer to give all mammals on Earth emphysema than stop burning fossils, and do it for 10x the price.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 12 points 1 week ago

That number is for doing it anually for 65 years. It lists roughly 18 billion per year for the cost.

But besides that, I think you are greatly underestimating the cost of the diamonds. Synthetic ones are way cheaper than natural ones, yes, but there's a lot of room between "natural diamond expensive" and "actually cheap". Going by these prices https://www.diamondtech.com/products/categories/diamond_powder_price_list.html

It's $2.5 million per tonne. I assume you could get a cheaper price per weight if you're buying five million tonnes of anything, but it's still two orders of magnitude more expensive than you are guessing

[–] jalkasieni@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

Firstly, it’s 5 million tonnes per year. For 65 years. Secondly, the cost is for a 65 year SAI program, including developing the tech and running the missions. Thirdly, this is all explained in TFA or the links therein.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 week ago

Nice try, DeBeers.

[–] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago

It's not cost effective to save humanity. Stock prices would crash.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

Just force debeers to open their vault. The cost would drop.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

This is garbage.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›